English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

aside from the videotape "confession/(s)" (found in a safe house") in which the man they allege to be "Osama Bin Laden admits to the attacks although there are quite a few problems with the tape...
1. The video is of very poor quality
2. "Bin Laden" appears to be writing a note with his Right Hand even though the FBI website has described Bin Laden as left handed http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm
3.This man in the video is wearing a gold ring. Expressly forbidden in Islam
4. When compared with other pictures of Contemporaries depicting Bin Laden this guy looks nothing like him.
5. In an interview with Ummat magazine published september 28th Bin Laden states the following "I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act."

2007-01-18 08:12:31 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

Osama. A known terrist...according to whom?

I can't/won't/don't believe anything anymore. Who is trustworthy, who do we believe?

Who knows.

2007-01-18 08:20:56 · answer #1 · answered by Linner 2 · 0 3

Everyone (the mainstream media, Obama and the US government) is making a big deal and going after Ahmadinejad for his statements on 9/11, but they didn't say a word when the highly respected former president of Italy said exactly the same thing. Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy’s oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies. In what translates awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera: “All the [intelligence services] of America and Europe…know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part … in Iraq [and] Afghanistan.”

2016-05-24 04:21:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You do make a good point, well thought out argument. I'm a CNN freak and watch news all the time, besides the video tapes, I can't really think of what all the proof is. So much time has passed, maybe there were other things, but I can't think of them right now to make a valid counter-argument to you. So why I am posting, only to point out one thing. 25 million is either the highest or I'm sure close to, the highest reward I've ever heard of for an FBI fugitive. I would like to think the government must be pretty convinced to offer so much. After writing this, I do sort of maybe recall where he denied it. I think he said something like he wasn't involved, but he was pleased with it.

Well, all we can do is see if they capture him alive and see all of the evidence they present in a court of law. Will he get a fair trial? I believe the prosecution and defense will do their jobs correctly. But could a jury of 12 (assuming he's not tried with a military court, in which I don't believe they use jurors) be able to have a neutral stance and only rule on the evidence? Afraid to say I find it likely not.

2007-01-18 09:02:08 · answer #3 · answered by SharpGuy 6 · 0 0

I will try to answer this like a liberal, which I am not. So here goes. In the 911 Commission Report, it states that the attack was from Al-Queda. Although Sandy Berger accidentally had a few pages fall into the outfit that he was wearing that day by mistake of course, and did not commit an act of treason, the report does state that it was OBL's people who carried out the attacks.

Now we libs all know that Bush started this war by himself and not a single Democrat voted to go to war. He has our soldiers killing for him and he takes all the credit for it. Thus using that logic OBL must take credit for the attack on 9/11. If we blame Bush for all the deaths in Iraq, Then we have to blame OBL for the actions of his people.

Wow that was hard to do. Oh well back to the logical right for me.

2007-01-18 08:45:17 · answer #4 · answered by mbush40 6 · 0 0

Wow, if Bin Laden says he didn't do it, we should believe him. He seems like such a stand up guy! The video I believe you're speaking of, was of good quality, and it sure did look like him. He's also wears an american made watch in many videos. So your argument is pretty lousy. He did admit it. So you can find a job now and occupy your mind.

2007-01-18 08:18:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I think he confessed in videos other than the fake one you are describing. The FBI must have more proof than what you are describing, they know from the connections from the terrorists involved in the attack that Bin Laden had to be the one involved.

2007-01-18 08:16:45 · answer #6 · answered by Sir Alex Awesome Valentine, Esq. 3 · 3 1

Lets see um BL was behind the embassy bombings and took credit with the help of his enemy Hamas (so what was that about killing innocent women and children). This was his second attempt on the towers. Stop it with the conspiracy crap the terrorist are bad.

2007-01-18 08:19:28 · answer #7 · answered by joevette 6 · 1 1

The administration just gave him 'credit' for 9-11. No...I don't think he had anything to do with it at all...I have what I call proof. Remember the Northwood Papers!! That's a HUGE clue people!

2007-01-18 08:28:36 · answer #8 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 1 1

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahah
Thanks for the laugh. Especially using as proof that part where bin laden denies it. GOOD ONE.

2007-01-18 08:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you see, you just opened a double edged sword

you guys assume Osama is hanging with Bush right now as if they are best friends

so why didn't they get the real Osama to be in the movie then?

2007-01-18 08:17:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Why would I waste time attempting to reason with someone who so obviously has decided to become a supporter and advocate of known terrorists?

2007-01-18 08:17:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers