No.
2007-01-18 08:03:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
I'm going to assume you just wanted to see what people would say because you could not really think there would be a chance of that happening. We do not hang people in the United States. We went to war for a reason and whether you alone agree with it or not is irrelevant. War is part of life--always has been and always will be--that is why we have this thing called the military. I respect people who have and are serving our country and I don't think people constantly criticizing every move is helping at all. I think anymore people just say they hate Bush because that is what everyone else says. I wish people would shut up about it and try to figure out who we are going to put in office next because right now the options aren't looking that great.
2007-01-18 14:13:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why does this question pop up everyday? Does no one that post this kind of question have an original thought? Bush is not going to be hanged because YOU don't agree with choices he's made. First of all, the United States doesn't use hanging as a method of execution. If you want that, move to Iraq, they'll be more than happy to help you in that department. Second of all, your "question" doesn't state one impeachable offense made by Bush. He caused people to die? Are you serious with this? Sending troops off to war is not the same as genocide. That is what Saddam did to be executed. You can dispute that Bush is doing the same thing but, guess what? A military is actually in place to fight in wars! Novel idea, right? It would be lovely if you formed an opinion of your own instead of jumping on the whole hang Bush idiot wagon because you think it's popular. You have neurons (I assume), use 'em!
2007-01-18 08:12:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
positive, dangle em, yet they are in reality the front men, a twin of all authorities has layers, so does genuine power, they are the great to the lots besides the undeniable fact that it truly is the position the money lies that has all the flexibility. Why do you imagine firms really a lot own each little thing in this u . s . a .? because it truly is a thanks to carry genuine power even as being completely nameless. it truly is why they made them entities unto themselves. So the quite wealthy might want to commerce them off among themselves like playing cards. Do you actual have self assurance those 2 are making the alternatives? Why is the "international monetary organization" promoting off presidential money from their vaults? might want to or not it truly is the yank greenback is very no longer properly worth a farthing in many years? scary. New international Order, right here we come.
2016-11-25 01:53:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have seen some interesting questions here but this one of the most disturbing questions I have ever read. Obviously the writer and a few of the folks answering do not have the slightest idea of what the bigger picture entails. It is not my intention to badger anyone here but it is so frustrating to read the immature and nonsensical statements....course on the other hand...USA is a free country...and you can say what you want...even if it is lacking in intellectual maturity.
2007-01-18 08:11:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋
It's not even remotely possible, it's just impossible. (at least in the Western World)
Having been a president, he will always be protected, that seems to be the way it goes in America. (I'm not from there)
I guess the same goes for VIP's in his administration.
As usual, (and not just in America) I guess that, IF someone's got to pay for the mistakes made, it will be someone (or more people, of course) from the lower ranks, unfortunately.
2007-01-18 10:09:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joshua 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
i am against the war in iraq as much as the next man. my brother is in the marines and has been overseas for almost 2 years. but this war is not just a blow them up point and laugh thing. when we went to iraq we went for weopons of mass destruction. now though we did not find any but when sadaam was confronted he said" i dont have any now but when i do you better watch your back". this is what waged this war. just like the foreigners who jump the border to america for a better life the iraqi's need help too. now i know that it seems unfair. but if we help iraqi's today maybe they will help us in the future.
2007-01-18 08:05:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by badtothebone28380 1
·
7⤊
0⤋
Hanging is not a choice as a method for the death penalty in the USA.
2007-01-18 08:07:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Cheminator 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No.
But you did answer the question "Where did all the Yahoo message board trolls go now that the message boards are down?".
2007-01-18 08:06:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by BDZot 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
As soon as you specify the "crimes against humanity" that he is guilty of, I will venture a guess.
2007-01-18 08:15:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Meresa 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
I wish you had been around during WWII...Wonder what you`d be saying about America then. You are a simple minded fool...or too young to know.
2007-01-18 08:12:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋