Fertility treatment, IVF (in vitro fertilization) treatment; IUI, ICSI and Laparoscopic surgery is very cheap in India. The cost is very low and the medical services are very good in India.
My cousin and her husband got their IVF treatment in India through the Forerunners Healthcare in India and is all praise for this company. She is a known case of PCOS.She is a very happy mother of a baby boy now. She just paid 2500 pounds for the full IVF treatment in India for which she was quoted 8000 pounds in private setup in UK.
Forerunners Healthcare is very famous in India. I read a lot about them in the newspapers. I have also read about a Chinese couple who planned surrogacy through the Forerunners Healthcare. They arrange financing for USA, Canadian, UK and other international patients who plan to have surgery and infertility treatment like IVF, IUI, and ICSI abroad for low price. They also have photos pasted of their International patients. You can checkout their website. There are huge cost savings. As a doctor I personally believe that surgery and treatment can be easily handled in India, as the quality of healthcare available In India is simply best in the world. The surgeons are USA/UK trained and facilities are 5 star.
http://www.forerunnershealthcare.com
Hope this helps.
2007-01-18 17:32:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Donna 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
i'll in common words answer this using my own adventure and having been in contact with lots of those who're receiving fertility treatment so i desire you do not ideas. My husband and that i (me 28, DH 29) had one loose cycle of IVF on the NHS and a next frozen enbryo move. obviously the concern of this question does no longer call for an opinion on what number embryos should be transferred as that is already regulated by technique of HFEA although I do sense it had to talk about that having more effective embryos transferred jointly does no longer develop the probabilities of treatments which incorporates IVF operating. transferring on from there - the concern of this question is somewhat contentious although i do no longer believe that any one, no matter if or not they could conceive clearly or require some ideas might want to learn what number toddlers they could have. it is a own determination and there should be no enormous enormous difference between those who're fertile and those who're no longer. that is as a lot because the couple in question to make your ideas up no matter if or not they an manage yet another newborn emotionally and financially and maximum resposible human beings will evaluate this earlier taking the steps to have next toddlers. also, funds, even though it does play a component in elevating a newborn is nost genuinely no longer the be all and end all. the flexibility to love, look after, handbook and motivate any newborn is a lengthy way more effective major (and helpful for the newborn) than fabric issues.. because it stands there are regulations in position for individuals from particular backgrounds (which incorporates those who've abused toddlers and so on) and that i total heartedly agree that if someone has earlier been found to have abused a newborn that they ought to no longer be assisted in conceiving as there are not any ensures that they would not do it back. Marital status, monetary situation or present relations length has no relevance as to if or no longer someone might want to receive fertility treatment. i think that all and diverse to in many cases human beings make rash judgements or have ignorant critiques about this subject matter (although I totally get exhilaration from that this isn't the case with all and diverse). I in basic terms sense that folk might want to recognize that they could understand someone very on the fringe of them who've had fertility treatment without understanding it and a properly regardless of the reality that out, knowledgeable, recommended opinion is a lengthy way more effective perfect than some provided on the following and different places. Indigo xxx
2016-10-15 10:11:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are in the same possition .I have been told I can't have kids now [ I found out i had pcos} but i had two kids to an ex years ago.
My partner has no problem with his fertility but we would have to pay as i have children.
I don't know why this is I think it's not fair either it's discrimination against him because i allready have children.
I think every one should be allowed 1 free treatment and then you should pay for any more treatment you decide to have
2007-01-18 08:48:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by anniebell 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Now everyone can cure infertility using this natural remedy http://pregnancyhelps.info
infertility can run in the family and one of the first things the doctor asks you when you go to a fertility clinic is your family history regarding cases of infertility or other reproductive issues.
If infertility is caused by genetic disorder then it's not unusual that one of the kids (your mom) doesn't have it and another does (your aunt).
two months of trying is still to early to be concerned about the fact that you might be infertile and it's also quite early to go to a fertility specialist. Go to a regular Obgyb to get a closer insight and see what ways there are are to improve your fertility rate.
Also remove alcohol, caffeine and cigarettes from your life because they might influence your chances too. Stress is also a risk factor when it comes to infertility.
2014-12-21 06:27:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2017-02-19 18:45:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never gotten free treatment. We dont have kids but three baby angels.
2007-01-19 04:56:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Katherine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because they have kids already, thats why the book must stop somewhere, for instance i have no childern and stuggling to conceive with my partner who hasnt got any kids either
why should a women have the same nhs treatment as me with someone who has 2 kids already?
2007-01-19 02:47:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by doughnut1002001 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not fair. I understand you 100%
2007-01-18 07:55:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Laird John Meredith 3
·
0⤊
0⤋