I thought Clinton's sexual activities and his impeachment were already solved.
Clinton was not impeached for cigar humping Monica and receiving oral sex from her. He was impeached because he lied to the Grand Jury. It does not matter what the lie was about. It is against the law to lie to the courts.
Bush has not committed any crimes.
2007-01-18 07:53:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
16⤊
1⤋
When will you guys get it? This has been explained ad nauseum. President Bush has not committed an impeachable offense, otherwise known as a crime. Clinton, on the other hand, swore an oath to tell the truth, and then lied, to Congress, to a Grand Jury and to the American People. Perjury is a crime and that's what lead to his impeachment. If it had not been for some very generous people in the Senate, he'd have been convicted and removed from office. Is it that difficult to understand?
Clinton is an admitted liar. On top of that, he's a philanderer and a womanizer. How can you even compare the two?
2007-01-18 07:54:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
15⤊
2⤋
by way of fact there is not any reason he could be. those "questions" are published all of the time on YA. President Bush has performed not something that's even on the edge of having the flexibility to label him as a conflict criminal. That actuality has been legally shown. people who think of in any different case are merely idiots. against the U.N. desires? The U.N. is a criminal enterprise with greater thugs than the manhattan Mafia. the only reason the U.S. keeps to be a member is by way of fact we fund the familiar public of it and we are between the 5 everlasting contributors alongside with China, Russia, France, and the united kingdom. Being considered one of those 5 contributors helps us to maintain veto capacity. Very key whilst coping with most of the different international places.
2016-12-16 07:43:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lWell, adultery is illegal in every state of the Union. It also represents a weakness and flaw in character not good for the Office of the President. Then, add to that the charge of Perjury.
An executive officer, leading American Forces has to keep on his conscience that his orders will lead to the deaths of his soldiers. His soldiers also will follow his orders, knowing it will cost their lives, knowing that if authorized by the US Senate (As John Kerry, Joseph Biden, and several others who have been in office skimming the register for far longer than the terms of Cinton and W combined, did; and, might I add that these Senators come from BOTH sides of the aisles. The Democrats did not as a solid block say "No. We do not want to go to war." They voted for this war as well.), that their deaths are by the will of the people they serve. If you were too caught up in your anger over 9/11 to realize that people die in war, then you should be ashamed of yourself, even more so than the President for making the order, after our representatives said he should do so.
2007-01-18 08:01:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
7⤊
1⤋
Hello, is there anyone home. Don't think so. I can take a fair wager that you have never served in the military! Am I right? If I knew where you lived I'd send you a quarter so you could go buy a clue! Where have you been since 9/11? You must be a Dem. (jacka--)
2007-01-18 08:15:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
First, he's not a war criminal.
Second, the liberal idiots now in charge of Congress will try and impeach him. They can't help themselves because they hate Bush so much. They'll find any excuse.
And that will be the end of the Democrat control of Congress. American's will be so sickened by this, that it will force the Democrat party out of power for another decade, as Americans learn they just can't trust them with important stuff, like National Security.
2007-01-18 07:54:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Uncle Pennybags 7
·
12⤊
2⤋
You think you're smart, but you really know very little.
Have you ever heard of lying under oath?
Both the House and the Senate voted for the war in Iraq.
Iraqi's have killed 99% of the civilians dead in Iraq.
2007-01-18 08:04:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sean 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
You don't understand, Libby. Clinton wasn't impeached for his affair. He was impeached for lying to a grand jury. He was also disbarred for lying to a grand jury as well. It was the terrorists that murdered 3,000 innocent Americans on 911. It was Saddam that killed 100's of 1000's of his own people. President Bush is doing his job to protect America. He is our troop's Commander In Chief, and it's their job to go when, and where called. They VOLUNTEERED for the job, and know full well what being in the military is about.
2007-01-18 07:53:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by mojojo66 3
·
16⤊
1⤋
Well let me think
He isn't a war criminal that's why
Too much Kool-aid for you
Try the real Jim Jones Kool-aid it is just right for you
Look it up
2007-01-18 09:56:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by bob b 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Trust me on this one if there were grounds for impeachment the proceedings would be underway. Bush is the most hated president (by the media and the other party) that I can remember and if they had a case they would have thrown him out. You can't impeach a president because you just don't like him.
2007-01-18 07:56:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by joevette 6
·
11⤊
2⤋