2007-01-18 07:02:47 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As the worlds largest business surly they could do a better job than Bush the worlds smallest man
2007-01-18 07:03:46 · update #1
ROFLMAO You are too funny, short bus!!! Nah, they wouldn't want to be in charge, why should they? They have the middle class paying for the US military to protect their interests around the world. All is fine in Wally-World!!!
2007-01-18 07:24:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
If we were interested in being cost effective, that would be a very sensible idea. But, everyone knows by now that this war is about plundering the US Treasury for all of Bush/Cheney business associates. They are raking in $3 billion per week from the Treasury, 500,000 barrels of Iraqi oil go "missing" every day on our watch over there, and heroin profits are skyrocketing in Afghanistan, why would BushOilCo consider cost effectiveness. As we allow all this to happen, we certainly are giving tacit approval to the Plundering Herd.
2007-01-18 15:20:00 · answer #2 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
How old are you? Is this a real question? That makes no sense at all. First off, you don't even know how to spell Wal Mart and what does Wal Mart have to do with war against Iraqis.
2007-01-18 15:16:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
All aboard...
F Iraq & Iran. Pull out and drop the bombs.
2007-01-18 15:35:15 · answer #4 · answered by DJFresh 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yuck yuck yuck, that's soooo amusing! You're so smart. You must be a political science major!
2007-01-18 15:12:54 · answer #5 · answered by charlie_the_carpenter 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋