Is George W the most dangerous crack pot in the world today?

Question

Yes yes Sadam was an evil dictator and the N Koreans are being lead by a nut bar we all know this . The list goes on.

Bush however has attacked and attempted to ocupy Iraq and lost - badly . So now he is sabre rattleing with Iran while bombing Somolia .....Somolia ? While backing the Ethopian army ..........Ethopian -? - Army ???

George is sitting on a stock pile of nuclear weapons and ordering the Somlians get bombed ? Ignoreing the fact that the Iraqi government is engadgeing in mass ethnic cleansing and that the "Iraqi" government is extrodinarily pro Iranian (good goping Bush )

The US's big friend in the middle east (Israel) has a couple of thousand people locked up without charge (if there lawyers had evidence they would be prosecuted - so it seems that after 2-15 years they are holding people with zero against them) Israel is practiseing open apartied - Arabs don't really get a vote you know - thats only for Jews . Of all the crack pots wouldn't you vote G.W.?

Michael :

1) I am not an American -

2) Sedition is the act of stealing soldiers to your own army - nation etc.

3) Since I am not trying to get an army I am in no position to commit sedition now am I ?

4) Calling George W a crack pot who is in fact a danger to both the American people and those who happen to live elsewhere is nothing more than common sense - I am glad I live in a country where free speech is a right not just a phrase on a dusty old piece of paper somewhere as it appears to be in your nation.

Rich S:

If you call that winning - well good for you - but you are not (or at least should not be) allowed to run an Army or hold political office.

I am sure however since the Americans "won" the war that you are pretty busy weaving baskets for the victory parade now aren't you.

Answer 1

Very simple answer to this without further elaboration.... YES

Answer 2

Ahhhh...helloooo....In case you didn't notice we won the war. We are still trying to win the peace. It takes guts and patience, something in short supply in the Congress. If we had no regard for civilian casualties, the whole mess would be over in a couple of weeks. But thats not the way we do things fortunately. The enemy obviously has no such scruples. The side that does what is necessary to win usually does as we saw in Vietnam. Our style of government requires steady and strong commitment. Our lifestyles call for immediate gratification. Its difficult to reconcile these two philosophies. All we can do is hope and pray that reason and the desire for justice prevail for both our peoples and the iraqis.

Answer 3

George Bush hands down... him and his neo-con acquaintances decide to invade Iran... a million million died iraqi's because of the iraq invasion... the rustic is so risky that they are questioning of dividing it up into 3 international places!!! They demonize Ahmadinejad with a view to discover an excuse to invade iran... many individuals are afraid the government is going to objective to degree yet another gulf of tonkin incident with a view to invade iran so as that they are in a position to regulate irans oil factors besides... notwithstanding if invading iraq has been on the table because of the fact clinton while a invoice referred to as operation Iraq replace into proposed in 1998... 9/eleven replace into the excuss to circulate to iraq even in spite of the undeniable fact that that they had not something to do with 9/eleven and no al queda replace into there.... so for those ignorant american's that blame each and every thing on muslims and muslim extremists, please inspect what your government is doing to thousands and thousands of harmless human beings international... a hundred thirty five international places have american troops deployed there, 500000 individuals exterior the U. S. serving, and a one thousand billion greenback foreign places coverage.... what are you men attempting to do... take over the international?

Answer 4

Ok let's see here:

Saddam hussein:
1. Tortured people in his underground chambers
2. Invaded peaceful neighbors
3. Let his people starve under sanctions

Kim jong il:
1. Crazy as a loon
2. Has a repressive society
3. Has a ruined economy
4. Lied about pursing nuclear technology
5. Let his people starve

Sure bush is more nuttier than him! (sarcasm)

Read a book. When you get older, you'll get smarter.

Answer 5

If you would check out some of the rantings of the President of Iran and you wouldn't be asking such a question.

And by the way, Arabs/ Palestinians living in Israel do indeed vote.

Answer 6

Sounds like the news in Canada is a bit mistaken or else you are mistaken. In any event, your factual premises have a lot of glaring errors.
To answer your question, I voted for Bush both times and would do so again. What is popular is not always right. I thank God he had the guts to at least try the right thing. And, he had the blessing of the US Congress in so doing.

Answer 7

Why are you so against America losing a war? Lincoln put people like you in jail for sedition. I'm thinking that law should be enforced again. Don't give me the first amendment BS either. Your rights are only protected if they don't infringe on others rights. Being seditious is not free speech.

Answer 8

He's bad But the GOP is thinking about runing Borat in 08

Go big Red Go

Answer 9

Before you start spouting off your left-wing liberal kookiness, you ought to figure out how to spell check, so you at least seem a bit intelligent. As for your Israeli Apartheid claim, you listen to Jimmy (peanut farmer) Carter too much. Start thinking for yourself.

Answer 10

That's a positive, I mean yes he is>>>

Answer 11

When we get out. And all Hell breaks loose, over there. They'll bring it over here. And you'll blame him for not keeping us safe? You Lib's live in Fantasy Land.