well, since hes nullified about 4/5 of the constitution and bill of rights, i doubt theres any grounds to anymore ..
2007-01-18 06:24:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
It will take a two thirds vote in the Senate to impeach, There are more crimes than anyone can list, as reasons for it. But the bottom line is that Republican Partisans don't care.
If they ever did then Bush would have been impeached for allowing (causing?) 9/11 when there were hundreds of ways it could have been stopped. Or before that, to be in office at all, instead of a real leader.
I only hope that he will get out of office in two years. With his disdain for the rule of decency, much less law, doing so is not a given.
2007-01-18 14:32:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dragon 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Resign? Why, unless he's impeached for committing some crime.
Impeached? For what crime?
He will leave office in January, 2009, as a result of the natural political process in the U.S., since he is no longer eligible to run for the Presidency, having already served two terms. From there, my crystal ball turns a bit cloudy.
2007-01-18 14:30:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dave_Stark 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
He will not resign because he is too busy trying to keep your empty head attached to your worthless shoulders and he won't be impeached becuase there are no grounds whatsoever for doing it. The Democrats would truly expose themselves to be the bleating sheep, vindictive soreheads and immature crybabies they are if they tried it.
2007-01-18 14:34:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
You libs just don't get it do ya. GW is the president. He was elected by the American people with over 3 million more votes than John "flip-flop" Kerry. You guys cite numbers that are totally wrong and expect everyone to believe you. The media leads you astray and you follow like sheep.
2007-01-18 14:33:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by slodana2003 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bush seems to be a Nixon clone with him having the same cabinet as Nixon. I'll bet he will wait until he is impeached then resign in shame just like Richard Nixon did. Remember the Republicans said Nancy Pelosi would never be Speaker of the House, yet she most certainly is. Wrong answers keep coming from the illiterate side. (R)ight
2007-01-18 14:29:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by BORG BUSH 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
There will be articles in future history books dedicated to sympathy for Bush because he had to put up with this crap.. It will be right in middle with an article named " Bush : The most underated president in history." to the left and the article "Year 2008 : Free speach revoked from left-wing nuts." to the right. God i wish i could read that history book.
2007-01-18 15:10:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Corey 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Neither have a snowball's chance in Hell of taking place. The President has no reason to resign, and in order to be impeached, he would first have to commit a high crime or misdemeanor. Unlike his libidinous predecessor, he has not done so and is highly unlikely to start now.
2007-01-18 14:23:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rick N 3
·
7⤊
2⤋
He certainly won't resign. Remember: He's the "decider"??? He is already going against what 80% of the country thinks is the right direction.
I wish someone would REALLY start to talk about impeachment as an option...I mean someone with the power to do something about it. Obviously there have been laws broken, but it seems that no one is seriously considering starting an investigation. Why?
2007-01-18 14:24:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
2⤊
6⤋
Neither, he will leave office on January 20, 2009, when the next elected President takes office.
2007-01-18 14:27:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Well im kinda wondering why you think that bush would be impeached he hasnt done anything to even be considered for impeachment!!!!!!
2007-01-18 14:23:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Dr. rew 1
·
7⤊
2⤋