English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Jefferson and the republicans feared the power of the judges on the supreme court because...?
a. they could be removed from only by the impreachment process
b.they were blocking jeffersons appointments
c.most of them were federalist
d.both a and c

2007-01-18 06:09:44 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Homework Help

3 answers

a.) True. As he once wrote:
"To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves."

He felt that the court should be technical specialists and not affect or set policy.

b.) Supreme Court judges cannot block appointments unless there is a legal case before them concerning the appointment. So b is out.

c.) This is less important than a. While he clashed with the court on technical matters due to the difference of party opinion, his greatest concern was the fact that the judges had life terms and could abuse judicial review as set down by Marshall.

I would pick a, although I will admit it's possible that d is what it's looking for.

2007-01-18 07:25:03 · answer #1 · answered by ³√carthagebrujah 6 · 0 0

A definitely, especially since Jefferson believed the threat of impeachment was not very strong.

Probably also C, since the Federalist judges in lower courts tried to apply the Alien and Sedition Acts against Federalists.

2007-01-18 07:11:26 · answer #2 · answered by geo1944 4 · 0 0

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (a million Cranch) c4ca4238a0b92382dcc509a6f75849b37 (c4ca4238a0b92382dcc509a6f75849b803)[a million], is a landmark case in u . s . a . regulation and the muse for the exercising of judicial evaluation of Federal statutes by using america splendid courtroom under Article 3 of america shape. The case resulted from a petition to the courtroom by using William Marbury, who were appointed as magistrate interior the District of Columbia by using President John Adams shortly in the previous leaving workplace, yet whose cost exchange into not introduced as required by using John Marshall, Adams's Secretary of State. whilst Thomas Jefferson assumed workplace, he ordered the hot Secretary of State, James Madison to withhold Marbury's and countless different mens' commissions. Marbury and 3 others petitioned the courtroom to rigidity Madison to furnish the cost to Marbury. The case exchange into finally unsuccessful for Marbury, who in no way grew to alter right into a magistrate interior the District of Columbia. greater information interior the hyperlink..

2016-10-31 11:00:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers