I'm all for ending proverty, but doesn't it seem that some governments in countries like Africa would rather see their people poor and starving so other countries will give them money/aide than to take care of it's own people? This would be the main way to end proverty in each country. We still need to do our part but individual countires should be held accountable also. Some stuff their own bank accounts with money that should go to help the people of their own countries......
2007-01-18 05:25:21 · 8 answers · asked by anjoek5859 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
First of all. Africa is made of a lot of small countries, each with their own governments. Each of those countries is still divided by tribes, or factions. Many african countries are in a constant state of civil war. Outside of that, many of the governments are not legitimate governments or are very corrrupt.
2007-01-18 05:34:13 · answer #1 · answered by Ed K 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
properly, i do not understand if i visit cheer you up, besides the undeniable fact that the answer is that you're the authorities. authorities isn't some thing better than the choose of all the human beings for the instantly ahead sturdy - a minimum of in a democracy it truly is. in case you're balloting responsibly, staying advised and doing all of your perfect to grant civic enter even as plausible or mandatory, you're perpetuating sturdy authorities. sure, we pay a ton of taxes. i have been by your journey two times in the only ideal couple of years and that i visit't say it made me very pleased both. yet in the great, if we opt for a wealthy u . s . a ., with sturdy infrastructure, sound military and local land protection, disaster preparedness, low crime prices, no man or woman homeless or without healthcare and preparation for our youthful babies and take care of our elderly, taxes are mandatory. The software prices are yet another tale. those human beings are only grasping. i'm waiting to attempt photo voltaic and geothermal. it would want to fee lots, yet a minimum of my relations is very no longer so vunerable to the whims of the moguls on the flexibility corporation.
2016-11-25 01:34:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you, I think the US should just start worrying about the people here in the states that need the help or worry about paying off that decifit instead of spending all that time and money trying to help other countries who are probably never going to change anyway. Just like when I get junk mail asking me to help a child in some other country - I just throw it away because I know that child will not get all the money that I would be sending to them.
2007-01-18 05:42:37 · answer #3 · answered by Jen G 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
cos there are still soma parts of the continent that has resources that the US can exploit....as long as there is a resource for exploit US will always be there......politics,government? it's all about money and great deal of money, why u think these stupid poiliticians would leave their jobs to run for service of a nation that they hardly even know their neigbors? cut the crap politicians!!!
2007-01-18 09:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by ladymaigrey68 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Africa isn't ruled by one government. That country's governments are more corrupt than Mexico.
2007-01-18 06:45:20 · answer #5 · answered by Lala 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they care about their own money more than their people. actually, in fact, some african countries are developing rapidly. ATTENTION, what you see on the CNN may not be what's happening in the entire Africa.
2007-01-18 05:31:30 · answer #6 · answered by di_cassano 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you did just 30 minutes of homework you wouldn't ask this question.
It's so much more than just poverty.
That's like saying Alaska has a lot of land......DUH!!!
2007-01-18 05:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should they whem yhry have US to do that
2007-01-18 05:32:04 · answer #8 · answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋