2007-01-18 05:05:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Great variation on the theme. To my knowledge no one has ever died from a BJ, War however has been the decimator of many a people, race, creed, and nation.
I would have to say that Mr. GW Bush does hold the upper hand when it comes to death figures.
2007-01-18 05:10:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You do belong on the Short Bus.
Clinton said "Regime change in Iraq is our policy" but he was too busy diddling interns and cheating on his wife to do anything. As a result, we found prisons full of 6 and 8 year olds when we liberated Iraq. How many Iraq children were tortured and murdered because Clinton was too busy getting a BJ instead of being a President?
If you disagree with the war, fine. It's a free country, you are entitled to be wrong and stupid. But Clinton did nothing except murder innocent Iraqis in an Aspirin factory, so if that's all you got, then you got nothing. Moron.
2007-01-18 05:22:56 · answer #2 · answered by Aegis of Freedom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No matter how you point out Bush's collossal failures, there will always be some republidouche who will mention some obscure, stupid inconsequential thing that Clinton did that PALES in comparison and act like it's equivalent.
Oh sure Bush lied to start a war that the entire world is against and 3000 American soldiers are dead because of it and Iraq is now a terrorist breeding ground...but um but um.... Clinton made a shady real estate deal!!!! OMG! He is the anti-christ.
What-the-fvck-ever. Reasoning with these people is like trying to explain quantum physics to a retarded 3 year old. It is not even worth the effort. Seriously.
2007-01-18 05:15:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A BJ doesn't kill people who give them do. The fact that Clinton got a BJ is not a problem but the fact that he used his position and the white house to do it is. The fact that he lied under oath is a problem and the fact that his lack of judgment put him in the position to be blackmailed or bribed is also a problem. It is very important that some one with the power affecting so many lives has integrity to prevent others from gaining leverage over them. Clinton's indiscretion is behind us and it doesn't appear to have been too detrimental and it is time to move on. Things could have turned out much worse.
2007-01-18 05:16:18 · answer #4 · answered by joevette 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was not at war, obviously. He did not have to deal with terror on such a big level after the 93 WTC bombings. As far as Bush and this war; all wars have casualty. It's a sad reality. However if we as a country stopped wars based on how many people die, Blacks would still be slaves, Nazism would rule the world, and we'd keel over like a dead dog in the face of any trouble.
2007-01-18 05:11:59 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Info 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No one died from Clinton's bj. But plenty died due to Saddam's murderous dictatorship. And yes, in war ppl get hurt.
You seem to forget the innocent AMERICAN CIVILIANS who were murdered on Sept 11th. Or do only innocent Iraqis count to you? It is a known fact that Saddam paid money to suicide bombers' families. Perhaps the hijackers wanted money for their families. Perhaps Iraq wasn't the best place to go after terrorists but we had to start somewhere.
2007-01-18 05:18:17 · answer #6 · answered by mikey 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wow, somebody reminded you of Blackhawk down.... Unfortunately there were lives lost. Nothing like the tens and perhaps thousands of lives lost because of Bush's lie. Let's not forget, Clinton didn't lie about that skirmish.
Also, please don't say Clinton lied under oath. We all know that. So what. No one died. Is Bush's lie a "better" lie, because he wasn't under oath. Hell no. A lie is a lie. And his was a whopper.
2007-01-18 05:12:49 · answer #7 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
fitting name. Bill Clinton wouldn't have the balls to take on any controversial tasks. Thank god he wasn't still around for 911. It was plotted and planned because Clinton pulled out of Somalia (cut and run) We aren't killing innocent Iraqi's. If we weren't there Saddam would be killing them. Many people died when slick Willy pulled out of Somalia. Clinton bombed and killed civilians in Cosavo. i CAN TELL YOU WHERE TO PUT THAT THUMB.
2007-01-18 05:14:31 · answer #8 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How many citizens did saddam kill?
Estimated 1-2 million.
How many more would he have killed if we hadn't done anything?
A lot.
Would the liberals be whining about how bush should've invaded Iraq if we hadn't before?
YES!!!
And clinton's casusalties were low because he didn't even make a half effort to stop terrorism!!!
Di-di-di!!
2007-01-18 05:10:37 · answer #9 · answered by Mcbob92 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
how many canadians died after clinton sold aids infected blood to the canadian government, need I also remind you of the movie black hawk down, yeah that was another clinton mistake that resulted in the loss of to many lives.
2007-01-18 05:09:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋