You can not solve for the relative humidity with the temperatue alone. You need the dew point as well. However, if you are looking for the absolute humidity (the weight of the water vapor in a given amount of air) then that can change as a result of changes in pressure and temperature which cause changes in volume or the given amount of air in which case the absolute humidity goes down. With a temp and pressure he can use the Gas law to compute the volume of air PV = RT where R is the gas constant and with R, P, and T known the volume can be solved for. If you know the weight of the water vapor in gm you can then compute this humidity. It seems as if some info might be missing in this problem you have given us. Remember the RH is the ratio of the air's water vapor content to its water vapor capacity at a given temperature. Hope all of this is of some help.
2007-01-18 04:40:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by 1ofSelby's 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
by pressure, do you mean vapor pressure? you must have a measure of vapor pressure, be it from relative humidity, dew point, etc. what units do you want moisture content in? with temperature you can get "saturation vapor pressure" which is the total vapor pressure that is possible at a given temperature. if vapor pressure = saturation vapor pressure, relative humidity = 100%. vapor pressure / saturation vapor pressure * 100 = relative humidity
2007-01-18 04:28:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by ecoandy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because, 35,000 American scientists have demanded an end to the CO2 fraud, there is no medical mechanism that permits CO2 to extend international temperatures. there is medical information that proves the CO2 degrees upward thrust and fall in Parallel with fluctuating temperatures, yet some 800 - 2,000 years behind them. In different words on the prompt's CO2 degrees were led to by the international temperatures 800 - 2,000 years in the past. besides the undeniable fact that, the Kyoto protocol became the brainchild of the UN's imagine tank, club of Rome: "the instantly ahead enemy of humanity is guy. In searching for a clean enemy to unite us, we got here up with the concept that toxins, the chance of international warming, water shortages, famine etc might want to in nice condition the bill. a majority of those disadvantages are led to by human intervention, and it truly is basically by replaced attitudes and habit that they are many times conquer. the genuine enemy then, is humanity itself." - club of Rome. "we favor to get some huge depending help, to capture the customary public's mind's eye... So we ought to grant up scary eventualities, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little aspect out of any doubts... each and each human beings has to make your recommendations up what the right stability is between being efficient and being difficulty-free." - Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC comments. obviously, bill Clinton, Al Gore, George Soros, Tony Blair and one yet another advise of a clean international Order, are contributors. it truly is envisioned that if guy peoduced no CO2 whatsover, it would want to learn a help in international temperatures of: 0.02 tiers in fifty years. yet to attain that the UN might want to bankrupt marketplace, tax CO2 emissions and grab administration of the international's power. that is why the human beings who understand the reality about the international Warming Con-Trick are rebelling. The Kyoto protocol, if observed will effect in the right act of planned genocide the international has ever considered. besides the undeniable fact that the UN's reported target is the help of the human inhabitants to 500 million. Why else do you imagine the u . s . have outfitted over 800 secret concentration camps?
2016-11-25 01:25:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by kull 4
·
0⤊
0⤋