Why does the U.S. government believe acts of war are an acceptible means to global peace?

Question

In one AP news article, it is clear the U.S. is continuing to send forces and aircraft carriers to the Middle East, and some kind of military operation must be underway, specifically aimed at Iran apparently because of Iran's steadfast refusal to halt it's uranium enrichment at the orders of the U.S. and the U.N.

In another article, "ElBaradei, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency, suggested that a military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities ultimately would not thwart its ambitions.
'What we know is that Iran has the knowledge, but you cannot bomb knowledge,' he said. ElBaradei warned that only applying pressure could prompt the Islamic republic to follow the path of North Korea, which kicked out U.N. inspectors and pulled out of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in 2003 and then conducted its first-ever nuclear weapons test last October. 'My priority is to keep Iran inside the system, he said."

So, why then does the U.S. government believe that acts of war are an acceptable means to global peace?

I said the U.S. GOVERNMENT is in favor of using acts of war as a means to global peace. I DID NOT say all Americans are in favor of this.

Answer 1

Peace has nothing to do with it. There is a difference between creating peace and creating order. Peace is usually a willing put down of violence between 2 or more parties. Order is compliance with someone elses will. On the back of US 1 dollar bill it says in latin, "Annuit Coeptis, Novo Odo Seclorum" which roughly translated means "Our enterprise is crowned with succes, The new secular order." On september 11th 1990 I believe it was Geroge Bush Sr announced the new world order on national television. Some years later on September 11th we lose our twin towers. Coincidence? George Bush Sr and George W Bush are PROVEN, not speculated freemasons. On the top of certain freemason certificate is the same all seeing eye as on the back of the US one dollar bill except on the freemason certificate is the words, "Odo Ab Cao" Order out of chaos. What better way to get people to do what you want than to create a chaotic situation, than you come in with the answer and solution to the problem you create. Now you're the good guy, the answer man, right, now when there's a problem people come to you because you have proven yourself in their eyes to be competent so now they trust you so you can abuse that trust in acheiving your personal agenda. Take a look at how the US has handled this entire situation and how the president is admitting mistakes and yet he continues to push his agenda...is it more probable that the leader of our nation is just that stupid to admit he's wrong and just keep doing it or is it more likely that this has nothing to do with any excuse he has given to be there and is all about his own personal agenda? Do you think that at this point even if Bush was telling the truth he is so stupid to believe that every effort thus far has failed so if he continues to do the same thing by sending more troops he'll succeed? That's insane unless he's just trying to buy more time for some alternate purpose...but you decide for yourself

Answer 2

Zionists say they want peace but in real life they are living on wars. Contemporary Zionist leaders want to keep occupying land that was never part of Israel. This position alone lead the world to believe that Israeli leaders are not working for real and final peace agreement with Arab world. Zionist are fooling both the Arabs and the Jews when they say they want peace. Peace is the missing link in the Zionist state.

Answer 3

I'd bet money that you are a liberal Demoncrat. How would you stop the ones that hate us? The ones that don't even cae if they kill their own people including babies. How would you stop suicide bombers who's own Mother's take pictures of them (looking proud) as they send them off to kill? Where is the way to stop it? Iran has wanted the west gone for many, many years. N. China and Iran are insane they want dominance like they have in their country. Come on tell us how to get peace. You would shake their hands while they blow us up? Why are you FREE? How did it happen?

Answer 4

I think your presumption that the increase in forces and the addition of a carrier task for is related to Iran's nuclear program is incorrect.

Answer 5

First of all it's the muslims that are the only group of people that commit genocide now if we want world peace we need to contain these people in the middle east and let the Russians take care of them!

Answer 6

If a rabid dog is running down the street toward where your children are playing, what would you do?

A) Whistle and say "C'mere pup... good boy, good puppy!"

B) Shoot him.

Answer "A" seems to be the reaction most liberals in this country have. The end results of the two situations would be about the same.

Answer 7

Read the article, they are preparing in case Iran pulls anything. Iran is becoming more and more arrogent lately. We dont know what he capable of and what he is truly willing to do. But to be safe than sorry.

Answer 8

We don't believe war is an acceptable means to world peace. What would make you ask such a silly question? What misinformation do you have stuck in your head that would lead to to think this.
Al-Kate-Ah believes that death (our death) is the way to world peace. We have to stop this.

Answer 9

Simple answer, delete all those who create violence or threaten war, and sooner or later things will settle down. If the rest of the world learns to behave in a civilized fashion, it won't be necessary for the U.S. to begin any more "illegal" wars.

U.S. policy now seems to be that a threat equals an attack. When the loonies stop rattling sabers, we'll stop drawing ours.

Answer 10

what does global peace mean?

does living under the threat of terrorism or a nuclear attack by a madman constitute "peace"?