English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Immediately pulled our troops out of Iraq
2. Sealed the borders and deported all Illegals
3.created a national health care system similar to Canadas
4.raised minimum wage to $15 an hour

2007-01-18 03:53:32 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

1. YES!
2. YES!
3. NO WAY! - Socialism creates high unemployment, high inflation, and government dependence. It will also raise taxes and curb entrepreneurial efforts.
4. No on that one too. People should be allowed to negotiate whatever wage they want with an employer. If I want to do something easy like lace shoes for $2 an hour, I should be allowed to do that. If I think $2 an hour is too little, then I'm not going to do it. I'll find something else and the employer will find someone else willing to work for what he is will to pay (whether that be, $2, $4 or $6 per hour).

Bottom line, If I believe that you could do the first two I would probably vote for you even if I disagreed with your socialist ideas. Most Americans would disagree with you on number 3 I believe. You might have popular support on #1,2, and 4.

2007-01-18 04:11:26 · answer #1 · answered by Marcus 3 · 2 3

1. No, because you'll just leave that country in civil war. As the next president, you need to clean up the mess left behind by the previous one.

2. No, that would cost you too much.

3. Good idea, since you have more money than Canada anyways....but you won't be able to pull it off after the money you've already spent in Iraq and sealing your borders and hunting down illegal immigrants, so no.

4. No, because then inflation will skyrocket and the price for a pack of gum would be $7.

2007-01-18 04:08:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Number 2 is the only one that makes sense, and it's only partly helpful.

1. would cause more terrorism from Iran.
2. sealing the border is good, but there has to be a better solution than deportation.
3. would be just as disastrous and costly as it already is in Canada.
4. only helps the unions and forces small companies to do layoffs.

So you wouldn't get my vote. Sorry.

2007-01-18 04:25:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 1 1

1. No-- It would be supporting genocide
2. yes-- let them enter legally and implement the same strict standards of entry as Mexico has..
3. No- It doesn't work. A cancer patient waits 3-6 months for treatment , some treatments are not available, government chooses you doctor,etc.....
4. No- I don't think the Fed. gov. has any right to determine an employees worth.

2007-01-18 05:07:12 · answer #4 · answered by bereal1 6 · 1 1

1. No
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. No

2007-01-18 04:25:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Rather vote for O'Bamba

2007-01-18 04:59:40 · answer #6 · answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5 · 1 0

1. No
2. No
3. Maybe
4. No

2007-01-18 03:58:59 · answer #7 · answered by catarina 4 · 0 2

hell no. the only thing on that list i'd like is number 2.

if i want a health care system like canada, i'd move to canada.

2007-01-18 03:57:07 · answer #8 · answered by political junkie 4 · 1 2

Um, no. How do you propose to do all this since we are already in debt up to our eyeballs? Raise taxes??

2007-01-18 03:58:47 · answer #9 · answered by rockinout 4 · 3 1

Sure I would!

You couldn't POSSIBLY be any worse than what we have in the Administration right now!

That's not saying much, however.

2007-01-18 04:01:42 · answer #10 · answered by sewmouse 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers