English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-18 03:44:25 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

13 answers

By far and away, the worst leader of the 20th Century was Jimmy Carter... He was the worst thing that happened to America between Pearl Harbor and 9/11...just as devastating to the country's psyche and pocketbooks

2007-01-18 04:13:56 · answer #1 · answered by Hammerhead 2 · 0 4

Well, I'm assuming you mean leaders of nations, empires, colonies, etc. There have been several, who could be regarded as terrible, lousy, or anything of the sort. In no particular order, here are my votes:

1. Slobodan Milosevic - former president of both Serbia and Yugoslavia.
2. Benito Mussolini - former prime minister and dictator of Italy.
3. Joseph Stalin - former dictator of the Soviet Union.
4. Vladimir Lenin - first leader of the Soviet Union.
5. Hirohito - emperor of Japan during WWII.
6. Hideki Tojo - general and head of Japanese military during WWII, considered to have had more power over the empire, than Emperor Hirohito.

I could probably go on, but these were the first guys who came to mind. Each was credited with leading his respective nation or empire, but each is also responsible for his respective nation's further decent. During the tenures of these men, their fellow countrymen were executed, starved, impoverished, degraded and treated as if they were less than human.

You may wonder why I excluded Adolf Hitler. He is actually regarded as the most influential person of the twentieth century. I do not discount that he was a monster and responsible for similar atrocities, as I had previously mentioned concerning the other former leaders. He was, however, brilliant. He was a military strategist. Many of his ideas weren't all that bad. Some of his ideals, theories and philosophies are being used by the U.S., Great Britain and several other Western nations today.

2007-01-18 04:30:16 · answer #2 · answered by naturalbornthriller69 2 · 1 2

Ford. Please go to wikipedia and type in Myayaguez incident. I was there. I lost 18 men that day 15May75. The so called last battle of Vietnam. I was a Navy Corpsman (Doc) with 2/9 Golf Co. out of P.I.

2007-01-18 05:04:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 1 1

You should ask for the best cause to find the worst is gonna be tough. There have been somany lousy leaders. But good one's, i dont know. Got to be a rare bunch, them.

2007-01-18 03:53:44 · answer #4 · answered by msifd 2 · 0 1

i don't think of you ought to positioned FDR, Truman or Churchill on that record. the hearth bombing of Germany and Japan and the dropping the A-Bomb exchange into an element of conflict - a conflict they did not initiate. every person arguing on the subject of the dropping of the A-bomb is Japan would not be attentive to what they are speaking approximately - the A-bomb did kill many human beings yet interior the long-term saved probably thousands and thousands (considering that we did not ought to invade Japan) yet that may not the question. mutually as Hitler is the main properly-known selection (and a solid selection), my appropriate 2 are: Joe Stalin - he exchange into ruthless and alter into in command of killing thousands and thousands of human beings - your 20 million huge sort is slightly short. He had 3 many years of rule the place he terrorized his countrymen. not purely did he throw cities interior the gulags yet he additionally murdered many people who purely happened be living in a city that alter into occupied by using Germans in WW II. Stalin additionally performed Soviet POW whilst they decrease back after the conflict (what variety of mad guy does that). Pol Pot - in case you seem on the proportion of human beings he killed in Cambodia - it fairly is sickening. He killed a million.7 Million of the 7.3 Million that lived in Cambodia between 1975 and 1979. so as that includes 26% of the inhabitants exchange into killed in 4 years - TWENTY SIX % OF HIS very own human beings. That huge sort would not comprise the huge sort tortured yet allowed to stay. it is declared that each single family members in Cambodia had 2 individuals killed or tortured by using Pol Pots Gov't. Say what you % - Hitler exchange into undesirable, Stalin exchange into undesirable, yet Pol Pot exchange right into a chilly blooded murderer. uncertain many of the worldwide fairly knows or realizes what Pol Pot did. So take your %. - Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot - proportion smart, Pol Pot exchange into the worst, Stalin killed the main of his very own countrymen and Hitler exchange into in charge for the dying of the main (in case you count huge sort all that died in WW II interior the european Theater, concentration Camps and what the SS did)

2016-10-31 10:45:36 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The largely unpopular dictator of China, then Taiwan - "Generalissimo" Chiang Kai-shek. Well, I see at least one person here knows who I am talking about -- he gave me the thumbs up.

2007-01-18 05:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by WMD 7 · 1 1

Hard to say. I'd say the most ineffective at preventing the economy from collapsing, massive unemployment, rising crime and corruption was Boris Yeltsin.

2007-01-18 04:24:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Any president between 1959-1973 the Vietnam war should have never have happened all them soldiers dead and for what Nothing

2007-01-18 05:10:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Margaret Thatcher. witch

2007-01-18 13:03:58 · answer #9 · answered by oif1983 3 · 1 2

Clinton

2007-01-18 03:51:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers