2007-01-18 03:21:14 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
No, first off we had our own problems at home at the time, besides the french revolution divided the nation at the time.... when the execution began and after the king was killed, our nation decided to stay out of it as though that wasnt our idea of getting freedom, however we did support them indirectly by still having trade relations with them
but to answer the question, no not a single soldier was sent, we barely had an army to deal with our own problems at home...
2007-01-18 03:28:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ottoman padisahs sent Janissary clothing to France to frighten the German assailants in the border.... This is history. The French kings asked for Turks' help against the Germans and the Ottomans were busy. Therefore instead of sending troops they sent janissary clothes and the trick worked for the stupid german assailants. The French soldiers wore the janissary clothes and the Germans thought that Ottomans were thereabout. HA HA HA .. This is the absolute truth....
2007-01-18 22:09:57 · answer #2 · answered by zibardog 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Partial answer: The French sided with interior reach-individuals, because of the fact they have been classic allies. the main impt. human beings in it have been Fr. (from Quebec) conventional Montcalm, Br. conventional Wolfe. They fought the final and decisive conflict on the Plains of Abraham, close to Quebec. (the two killed, yet Wolfe gained)...The lives of the colonists replaced because of the fact Brits aquired Quebec, whose borders they accelerated into the Ohio Valley (a variety of of the Midwest). The Brits then exceeded the Quebec Act, which blocked colonists from settling interior the Ohio valley - this act replace right into a important reason for the Revolution. NB - human beings might desire to call the conflict by it;s different offical call, 'The Seven Years conflict' - and keep away from the discrimination in calling interior reach-individuals 'Indians.'
2016-10-07 08:30:43 · answer #3 · answered by rotanelli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the french revolution took place in the later part of the 1700s when the USA was still an infant country. I would suspect that they didn't have the resources then to go fight other peoples wars.
2007-01-18 03:29:54 · answer #4 · answered by al b 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dumb question... but French women are beautiful. Ottoman padisahs were aware of this fact. When they emitted rumor to the effect that they will conquer France, the French people were sending a group of 40 women to Ottoman emperors as gift in order to protect their country.... This is history...
2007-01-18 20:16:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. We were too busy trying to get the US organized. Also, considering the nature of the French Revolution, I'm not sure that any American volunteers would've been welcome for the long haul.
2007-01-18 06:05:53 · answer #6 · answered by psyop6 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They just ended their turmoil for freedom, and tryed to reorganize their country.
And how do u mean : help the french in Fr.Revolution?
Helping them to kill themselves?
or after the civil war?i guess.
They didnt have the potential.Its that easy.
And what if they had?
Colonization brought diff pple from diff nations on a very high scale,
wich resulted such a mix in traditions and ideology.How can you fight against your mother county, the place where you came from, where you ancestors or even your relatives live/lived?
-WW1,WW2, and the isolationist USA case.-
so the answer is:NO
2007-01-18 04:58:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, didn't have the resources in terms of troops or money.
2007-01-18 04:20:33 · answer #8 · answered by mu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so. The US was not the world police force back then.
2007-01-18 03:23:59 · answer #9 · answered by Dan G 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no
2007-01-18 03:23:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋