English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-18 02:33:51 · 15 answers · asked by Uno 2 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Hichef, im honored to be compared to Shiraz but im not him and this is my picture, not his.

2007-01-18 02:41:04 · update #1

15 answers

Hmm.You're showing your ignorance, son.

There ARE however, many parallels between W and Hitler.

Many unfortunate parallels.

A study funded by the US government has concluded that conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in "fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity".
As if that was not enough to get Republican blood boiling, the report's four authors linked Hitler, Mussolini, Ronald Reagan and the rightwing talkshow host, Rush Limbaugh, arguing they all suffered from the same affliction.

All of them "preached a return to an idealised past and condoned inequality".

Republicans are demanding to know why the psychologists behind the report, Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition, received $1.2m in public funds for their research from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.
The authors also peer into the psyche of President George Bush, who turns out to be a textbook case. The telltale signs are his preference for moral certainty and frequently expressed dislike of nuance.

"This intolerance of ambiguity can lead people to cling to the familiar, to arrive at premature conclusions, and to impose simplistic cliches and stereotypes," the authors argue in the Psychological Bulletin.

One of the psychologists behind the study, Jack Glaser, said the aversion to shades of grey and the need for "closure" could explain the fact that the Bush administration ignored intelligence that contradicted its beliefs about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

The authors, presumably aware of the outrage they were likely to trigger, added a disclaimer that their study "does not mean that conservatism is pathological or that conservative beliefs are necessarily false".

Another author, Arie Kruglanski, of the University of Maryland, said he had received hate mail since the article was published, but he insisted that the study "is not critical of conservatives at all". "The variables we talk about are general human dimensions," he said. "These are the same dimensions that contribute to loyalty and commitment to the group. Liberals might be less intolerant of ambiguity, but they may be less decisive, less committed, less loyal."

But what drives the psychologists? George Will, a Washington Post columnist who has long suffered from ingrained conservatism, noted, tartly: "The professors have ideas; the rest of us have emanations of our psychological needs and neuroses."

2007-01-18 09:57:41 · answer #1 · answered by justagirl33552 4 · 0 1

No. Hitler's political beliefs were that of a fascist. Hitler became on the acute right of the political spectrum, if he's to be compared to absolutely everyone it will be those of the acute right of the Republican party. once you're desirous to bash Clinton, please do your analyze and make your accusations with the perfect totalitarian dictator. there are a mess of them available that are/were on the left wing.

2016-10-15 09:54:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Both were born on the cusp of a fire sign - Hitler, Aries/Taurus cusp (April 20), President Clinton, Leo/Virgo cusp, (Aug 19).

That's the only thing I can think of.

2007-01-18 02:40:18 · answer #3 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 3 0

They were both in power before the "wannabe" great leader of people,, " the Decider",who could pick up a few leadership points from either, It's one thing to be PRESIDENT,in title, and be "a great leader", in action

2007-01-18 02:43:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

2 arms, 2 legs and a head.

2007-01-18 02:41:12 · answer #5 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 4 0

You usually ask intelligent questions. Thanks for reinforcing my belief that all conservatives are narrow-minded and bitter. Wow, you are gonna be really bitter when we win the White House in '08.

2007-01-18 02:47:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

They were both legally elected to their nation's top leadership position.

2007-01-18 02:38:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I don't see that they are. Hitler understood the importance of a strong military.

2007-01-18 02:37:58 · answer #8 · answered by DOOM 7 · 5 4

They both like to BLOW their top. They would have made a lovely couple.

2007-01-18 02:41:20 · answer #9 · answered by puppylove 2 · 0 3

They're mediocre exterior hides a evil inside that can plunge the world into war!

2007-01-18 02:38:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 7

fedest.com, questions and answers