Uh, oh, liberals! Now we REALLY had better negotiate and use diplomacy, or else! Right?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070118/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear

Answer 1

I suggest we sit down with them and negotiate an appeasement with them. Preferably in Munich. Then we can call it the Munich Accords, and we can wave a paper around shouting "Peace in our time". Because it worked so well before.

Answer 2

Let's use some deductive logic here.

Ahmadinejad is willing to go to war to protect his nuclear ambitions.

The conservatives of Iran are against him.

In the US and the rest of the world conservatives are against liberals.

Ahmadinejad is against the conservatives Thus he is a liberal

Thus we can deduce that the Liberals of this nation will allow Ahmadinejad to obtain his nukes and destroy Israel and the East Coast of the United States.

Thank you America for electing liberals like Ahmadinejad and placing them into power in the United States.

Answer 3

Washington situations - suitable.....Bush ruined u . s . of america - 8 million jobs outsourced, checklist extreme deficit, 2 unpaid wars, 2 tax cuts for the wealthy, de-regulated Wall St which crashed to 6800 the final day of Bush's 8 years, much less individuals with Healthcare, decrease generic of residing for majority of individuals, You do understand in case you seem up the precise ranked presidents, maximum are Liberals. Liberals have been interior the Republican social gathering for the time of Lincoln days and right this moment Liberals are interior the Democratic social gathering in case you seem at Mount Rushmore, they are all Liberals. (Washington fought against the Englands Conservatives in the process the admired conflict, Lincoln fought against the accomplice Conservatives interior the Civil conflict, Jefferson wrote our statement of Independence to get faraway from Conservative super Britain, and Roosevelt began the imaginitive social gathering) info that conservatives can no longer dispute !!!

Answer 4

I think it's pretty clear that Bush invaded the wrong country. He should have invaded Iran rather than Iraq.
It really bothers me that the leader of the hostage takeover in the 70s is now the leader of Iran. If any country's leader needed taken out, Iran is at the top of the list in my opinion.

Answer 5

Negotiating with a madman is always a very bad idea . Plain and simple . No bias, no spin, but now I'll check to see what other user's are saying . This outta be good !

EDIT* - I think the user above me should check her facts before posting such falsehoods .

Answer 6

Yeah, all the evil terrorists and terror-sponsoring states want is to be our friend, and sell us oil, not fly planes into our buildings........... wait, that happened?? SEE-BS told me that Bush made it up.

Answer 7

May I quote the article...

"The U.S. and its allies accuse Iran of secretly trying to develop nuclear weapons, an allegation Tehran denies."

Which means that they have not created a nuclear weapon, so how are they going to use a weapon that has not been created yet?

Learn about the media... They are trained to make exciting headlines they'll catch your eye while being able to protect their a** if someone questions it.

Answer 8

And in the mean time the pentagon is selling them parts for the Tomcat fighter planes...Nukes are everywhere....it is a matter of time.

Answer 9

If you are advocating that we attack Iran, I would think twice. Iran would make Iraq look like a day at the beach.

Answer 10

I guess it was a good idea for Bush to fight fire with fire right? Good thinking...