English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the other day some one told me they thought bush wanted it to happen for an excuse to attack iraq. personally im not convinced. just curious to find out what other people think.
thanks

2007-01-18 01:17:40 · 17 answers · asked by john9999999 3 in News & Events Other - News & Events

17 answers

does anyone realy belive that a bunch of guys could realy fly a plane into the center of new york unchalanged , then do it again

what happend to all the defence system that america spend billions of pounds on

also those buildings remain the only steel structures to come down "due to fire"

there was no way the buildings would have come down so fast once they collapsed . that broke all laws of gravity

even with nothing in the way an apple would have fallen down slower than those buildings did

the fire was not hot enough to rip through steel like it did
and only highley advanced explosives could have produced that big white cloud

we did an experiment at uni and the tops of the towers would not have fallen straight down ontop of the towers how they did
anyone who knows about structual faliure will tell you the same thing
and the report investigation was a pharse
fmea didnot even investigate it

to me it is blatantly obvious and the more you look into it the worse it gets

THEY WANT YOU TO BE LIVING IN FEAR .

bush and co need this kind of stuff to carry on happening so they can pass new laws like the patriot act easaly,
and make more money and get more power
same thing happend in london
these muslims are brainwashed into this alquieda because they feel outside society but they dont realise who there boss is and bin ladin famaly and bush famaly are one and the same best friends

2007-01-18 01:31:06 · answer #1 · answered by ben s 2 · 0 3

The individuals planned and and executed that plan of choice when they attacked America. They claimed to have done so in the name of religion....sure it created an illusion and the proof of illusion was that they did the direct opposite of their own religious practices. It's irony - they rebelled against what they claim to stand for so are they really believers?

Former President Clinton created an illusion our country was weak by the chosen lifestyle he lived in our White House/Oval Office. We are largely a nation of believers yet our nation's former leader also rebelled so thus they point out our "western ways" by doing the same it's called being a hypocrite. They made personal choices and their is no excuses for their choices. The chosen behavior of President Clinton did not represent all just like the terrorists do not represent the true spirit of Islamic belief. It is possible that the rebellious groups had wishful thinking that President Bush would be a identical to his father. President Bush chose to protect. I can imagine it's a hard call but I do know most were intruded upon by 911, not just the victims and survivors.

Ecclesiastes 3

Bush wanted it to 911 happen? There is too much drama and gossip connected with that theory all based on he said/she said. IMO they are taking too long but it could be that resistance is the problem. People may be allowing fear to cloud their view of change. Anyways, when it is finally over Iraq will hopefully become self-sufficient and an elite part of the travel industry. I think that will greatly benefit the country of Iraq after being under the control of S. H. for so long...he oppressed and created depression.

2007-01-18 02:41:46 · answer #2 · answered by GoodQuestion 6 · 0 0

Conspiracy theorists all have the same thing in common: No common sense, ignorance, and they all hate the President. Take 'Cruz' for example that answered your question, he states Israel was behind it because no Jews showed up for work when for a fact they did show up for work. He states Bush was in Texas, fact is he wasn't in Texas. There are people that believe a missile struck the Pentagon and not an airplane, why do they ignore the hundreds of eye witnesses that saw the plane hit? Why do they ignore the body parts removed after the crash? Why do they ignore that the plane in question never made it to it's scheduled destination and had a flight number? In conclusion, they should ask themselves this question, if the same thing happened and there was a Democrat president (Gore or Kerry) would they still believe it was a conspiracy?

2007-01-18 08:41:17 · answer #3 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

OK...I must admit that I truly believe it is all a big sick American joke against humanity!I'm not prejudiced against USA but I have read and I have listened to James H. Fetzer and there are so many proofs that it is a insider work!Take a look at The scholars for the truth 9/11 web page and you will see what I mean.There are dozen disproofs of the official government account, the truth of any one of which is enough to show that the government's account cannot possibly be correct.
The thing is that American people will never believe this.They don't want to believe it.My aunt lives in NY and lost one best friend that day.She will never believe that their own government did that!They don't want to admit that they are playing games with their lives.It's too sad.

2007-01-18 21:57:40 · answer #4 · answered by Erina♣Liszt's Girl 7 · 0 0

It was not so much a conspiracy, but more a case of America believe that it was beyond the realms of possibility that it could be attacked in such a way, their security services had information of an impending attack, but the government did not take the threats seriously. Once again just like Pearl Harbour, American had their head up their @rse and were not looking at the bigger picture.

2007-01-18 02:11:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What do you mean 'instigated'? Do you mean 'implemented'? One insider? I don't think so, it was a team, which Bush as installed president and self-proclaimed 'commander-in-chief' authorized, and which Dick Cheney and his long-time PNAC buddy Donald Rumsfeld, and others carried out (Cheney had usurped NORAD command from generals just a few months beofre 9/11, the first time that any White House official had direct command of NORAD, and of standard shoot-down procedures for hijacked planes, which were not followed on that day.... of course Cheney and Rumsfeld belonged to the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), which called for increased military spending, and military agressiveness abroad (with an Iraq invasion at the top of the list), and which also called for a "New Pearl Harbor" to galvanize American opinion in their favor, in a document they published one year before 9/11)

oh, and it isn't just 'some' people who believe (based on blatant facts that fly in the face of the 'officical story'... or white-wash, or cover-up, or whatever you want to call it) that 9/11 was an inside job, but fully two-thirds of the adult American population (the other 30 percent are so mentally impaired, they cannot remember what year 9/11 took place.... fact)...

2007-01-18 02:50:18 · answer #6 · answered by serge 2 · 1 2

If it was an inside job the problem would be keeping the operation secret with so many who would have to be involved.
I think that the truth is as generally understood and that it is inconceivable that the President would have wished such an atrocity to happen. Conspiracy theories only serve to muddy the waters

2007-01-18 01:31:41 · answer #7 · answered by Robin C 4 · 0 0

It was thought up by the Israeli secret service. they were naffed off with the USA for not taking out Saddam the 1st time round so they came up with the idea of hitting the WTC with planes. the document was then leaked to the Bin Laden & his gang, who then used it - dates were already set for it. It's strange that Bush was in texas and was quite relaxed about it all. The US already knew as they'd had a warning - All jewish workers were called at home and told not to go to work that day by an unknown source. Hey it worked Isreal got the USA to go back into iraq and take out Saddam!

2007-01-18 01:26:55 · answer #8 · answered by Cruz 4 · 0 3

My borther in law has found a conspiracy on the internet about the 9/11 but i don't know where it is and have not seen it but it wouldn't surprise me.

Below is a web site i just looked at wether it is true or not we will never really know.

2007-01-18 01:30:15 · answer #9 · answered by Missbutterfly:-) 3 · 0 1

Bush would have invaded Iraq if a sparrow flew into the WTC. He had it in his little head when he moved into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. It just gave him another excuse.

2007-01-18 01:40:58 · answer #10 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers