against the USA that has 10,000 times more nuclear bombs and better technology? Do you think the Iranians that stupid to start war against Israel that has nuclear bombs, better weaponry and they know is an American ally. Who wants this war with Iran and why?
2007-01-18
00:27:22
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Lion
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Iran is gonna build a nuclear reactor to produce energy and Russia was helping them in that - not in building a nuclear bomb.
2007-01-18
00:37:53 ·
update #1
Then you need to fight the backpackers with nuclear bombs and not the countries with millions of people.
2007-01-18
00:52:10 ·
update #2
You see your first mistake is basing your question on logic with people who posses very little.
Logic would suggest as a nation, Iran with its vast oil wealth you would use it to turn your nation into a shining example in the middle east like Dubai.
Instead of building weapons, so when you are dealing with unstable government , just like unstable individuals the playbook goes out the window and nothing can be predicted.
2007-01-18 01:29:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ynot! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My guess is that it will take Iran anywhere from 5 to 8 years to have actual nuclear weapons. Of course, they would be stupid to use them, as it would mean the end of Iran. Israel would nuke Iran, and that would be disastrous. And the United States could also do even worse to Iran.
But its very hard to say how this situation will play out. A military attack against Iran would have enormous consequences. But then Iran having nukes would also be bad.
Take away nuclear power, and Iran is probably no less formidable than Israel. So if Iran did have nukes, then the two counties would hold each other in check in the region, and would have potential to inflict great harm on one and other. That is why I tend to see Israel launching a strike against Iran in the next couple of years.
2007-01-20 00:14:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I seriously think Iran will want to blow up Isreal and from such, hope the UN pulls through for them to prevent any retaliation. I doubt it though, i know if Iran bombs someone, Iran will immediately become a waste land
2007-01-18 00:31:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the frustrating section is "enriching" the uranium. you may separate the u-235 from the u-238. established subtle uranium, even organic, won't create adequate of a sequence reaction to explode, even though it's going to get warm in case you pile up adequate. the element is, the only thank you to chop up the 238 from the 235 is to apply a centrifuge to chop up it by utilising the reasonable distinction in mass. Uranium is a refractory (very extreme melting factor) steel. It desires to be gassified so as that it is centrifugally separated, one atom from the subsequent, by utilising weight. it is the centrifuges that is destroyed. as quickly as the uranium is separated it may be hidden genuinely. definite, it would be a sturdy thought to arrest/kill any psycho nutcases caught enriching uranium and advocating destruction. Even on a small scale, they had ultimately have adequate. designing a bomb is much greater handy than you think of. The perplexing section is to create a precisely timed around implosion to jam the serious mass jointly. yet whilst your "transport automobile" exchange right into a truck extremely than a missile, there is an greater handy way. notice: Nuclear reactor gas isn't enriched adequate to explode, no count what you do to it. Chernobyl exchange right into a steam explosion from overheating. A containment dome might've contained it. Plutoniums a various element. it may basically be created interior nuclear reactors of a undeniable layout. And definite, i might additionally want arresting/killing any nutcase with a breeder reactor. observe that I basically want arresting nutcases with nukes. Even liberals could not be stupid adequate to argue that? If it exchange right into a rustic desirous to safeguard itself (Israel) that'd be diverse. what's the deal, you hoping Iran will ruin Israel, and end there? you think of we would be secure if we merely throw Israel to the wolfs? If that doesn't paintings, who're you prepared to sacrifice next? Sharp as a marble, you're.
2016-12-16 07:28:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The part of that story you left out is that Russia is helping Iran to build nukes. Why?
2007-01-18 00:33:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What happens when they sell the nuclear product to a nut who wants to use it in one of our cities? Hell I am not worried about them lobbing a nuke at us, I am worried about the ignorant extremist with a backpack bomb!
Good plan, can you tell me exactly where the terrorist cells are? Do we nuke the building they are living in? Well there are terrorist cells in every major city throughout Europe. I really don't see that happening, do you?
2007-01-18 00:46:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
All this talk nobody is going to do anything.No one wants to be responsible for the inilation of their people. Iran knows they cant "wipe israel off the map" because we will blow them off the map.
2007-01-18 00:35:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋