He's freakin' desperate at this point - but it's way too late
for changing opinions at this point.
2007-01-18 15:02:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not going to answer the question itself, but rather the answer above me. Sir, you who claim that people are ignorant of the Constitution are ignorant yourself. The 4th amendments has total bearing over this case- and it requires a warrant. If you do not have a warrant, any search, electronic or otherwise, is illegal withing the jurisdiction of the United States constitution. By switching to the FISA court, Bus is admitting that. Just about everybody else on capitol hill realizes that, and the Bush Administration was the last holdout. Warrantless wiretapping was, and is, unconstitutional. For further detail, see Arlan Specter's comments on the subject.
2007-01-18 00:33:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Big Box 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
What was announced is that a special federal judge has reviewed the wire tapping program and has approved it. This I believe is a method to bring some review into the process and avoid some rather nasty potential house hearings on the subject
2007-01-18 00:14:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by david42 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Oh no, don't forget that President Bush, who has never acknowledged making a mistake, is perfect and that any question concerning the Spy Program only involves "adjustments" to and not the scrapping of a program.
2007-01-18 00:09:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by cliff 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
i don't comprehend yet i comprehend that having listened to all of the debates and particularly a number of the rallies, the regulations Obama proposed make a great purchase greater experience. not something is decrease in stone in any case. i'm particular as quickly as the hot government is able to roll and all that brainstorming capacity is positioned to apply, many courses would be subtle and greater useful ones positioned to paintings and as those alterations start to ensue plenty will improve. i could basically discover one or 2 factors of exchange proposed from McCain and the rest have been in certainty innovations he piggybacked on from Obama. i don't see him or Palin as useful or prepared or able to do plenty else different than dictate their will.
2016-12-16 07:28:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is so busted with his second Watergate. They definitely knew better with the results of Richard Nixon. The first 100 hours of Congress is to set up with new legislature to the investigation of 9/11. Bush will be on fire with Scooter Libby and Dick Cheney.
2007-01-18 00:35:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by MYSTIC MINDS 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not at all. It's more a concession to the fact that most Americans are ignorant of the Constitution and are too stupid to realize that such activities are indeed within the President's inherent powers. Rather than waste time trying to educate the nation's dullards about the Constitution (remember, these are people who think Welfare is a legitimate outlay of the federal government), he just went and changed it so he could do his job without more idiot Democrat demagoguery.
It was not ever illegal.
2007-01-18 00:23:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
No it means Bush is worried that the courts may actually bust him after all for doing warrant-less wiretaps
2007-01-18 00:11:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
No its an admission that he won't get his way totally , although they are seeking a special court to approve them, so thus hes merely switching tactics
2007-01-18 00:42:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by paulisfree2004 6
·
1⤊
1⤋