2007-01-17 21:42:19 · 23 answers · asked by Fariaz-group 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He was a horrible excuse for a human being but the US and their puppets had no business going in there. It should have been left to the Iraqi people to get him out. The US just made things 10 times worse by going in.
2007-01-17 21:53:02 · answer #1 · answered by Jack O'Lantern 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Hes bad, well not just bad hes terrible, but so is most most arab leaders whos most of them gained power by military might.
As bad he is he still is a war crimminal and should have been put to trial as that.
He is considered as a war crimminal becuse he was overthrown by an occupation force not by his own people.
So how come the generals whos slaughtered many indivisuals in bosnia, chechena, and Kosovo got trialed by international courts.
whereas Saddam was sentence to death by the iraqi court which was obviously backed by the US.
This is wrong everybody should have the right for a fair trial no matter how notorious the person is.
Lets just say the US wanted to show an example to the rest of the arab leaders who are or used to be backed by the US like Saddam.
2007-01-17 22:10:41 · answer #2 · answered by MSK88 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the people who died during Saddam's rule are far less than the ones who are dying now because of the occupation lead by the US and its allies.
if you say Saddam's bad then i say Bush and Blair are 10 times worse and i hope they get what they deserve but i doubt they'll ever be as brave as Saddam Hussein and they way he stood against the american tyranny. Even in his execution he stood brave and refused to have his head covered.
if you want to start labeling people by good or bad why don't you start with your own and let the Arabs and Iraqi's in particular deal with their own problems.
2007-01-17 22:10:34 · answer #3 · answered by fate_n83 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was good. what he did (if he had done anything ) was what he thinks is good for his country.
my personal comment is that TOOOOOT (censored) only made that story to take control of the oil resource of the world. everyone knows that Iraq is the biggest suppler of the worlds oil. now with Saddam gone and the Iraqi people thinks that they have a dept to pay to TOOOOT (censored) they have total control of the oil.
That means more money...
it only shows that TOOT (censored) will eliminate every person in his path to world domination wahahaha! (hehehe) world control. TOOT (censored) is willing to do anything to protect his Power over all the countries of the world.
TOOT (censored) Scum!
sorry for being so bias..........
2007-01-17 22:01:46 · answer #4 · answered by adventurer_07 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Saddam Hussein was a murderous tyrant.
2007-01-17 21:47:05 · answer #5 · answered by ©2009 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
99% Bad
1% Good.
It's said that there's some good in everyone. Saddam was as close to an exception as one could get.
2007-01-17 21:49:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was a bad man that maintained a bad culture... that is the bottomline. We, yes we did, orchestrated his execution based on our standards. His actions were from a culture of celebrating with gunfire in the streets, beheading ppl means nothing, and women mean nothing.
2007-01-17 23:16:05 · answer #7 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why would you ask such a question. Deep down inside, do you think he was an all right guy?
Maybe you need to read some history about this sick leader and all the murders he ordered.
He was hung on the same gallows he ordered his victims to hang on!
2007-01-17 22:21:05 · answer #8 · answered by wishiwas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think hes dead and if his beliefs are correct then hes saddamizing 77 virgins now
2007-01-17 23:10:31 · answer #9 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad
2007-01-17 21:44:10 · answer #10 · answered by fender2clone 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He was as well Hung as a Leader gets................ I seen a soap on a rope with Saddams Image on Ebay. I want one of those!!!
2007-01-17 21:48:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋