Will or Should Pelosi impeach Bush?

Answer 1

Will = Pelosi has stated the Democratic party will not impeach him

Should = Yes they should. Why? Because he is a madman that thinks he is a dictator. He is no better than Saddam. He continues to completely ignore the American ppl and Congress with is Iraqi occupation. They need to get him out of there.

Answer 2

Nancy Pelosi has already said that impeachment is not on the table. If evidence were to surface that would put it "on the table" so to speak, it would be at the discretion of more then just Pelosi.

Answer 3

If the question was, "Does Bush deserve to be impeached?" then I'd say yes. However, I don't think he SHOULD be impeached because our government already has too much to do to correct his mistakes. An impeachment would just take up too much valuable time. I'm with Al Franken... I think they should impeach him on the last day of his presidency so it doesn't take up as much time! hehe

Answer 4

In fact, Bush should be very eligible for an impeachment trial. However, given the party breakdown of congress it will never happen.

Answer 5

Pelosi impeach Bush? The B**** does not have that power, go take a civics lesson on how impeachment works.

Answer 6

The major players in the Bush regime are many of the same people who were around during the Nixon administration. Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, for example were aides to Gerald Ford who followed and pardoned Nixon. They tried to persuade president Ford to veto the enhanced Freedom of Information Act. Back then they seem to have recognized that the truth would haunt them. It still does. They preferred to operate with impunity then as they do now. What can one expect from the same cast of characters? They were sick then, when Nixon was in office, and, they are sick now.

History has a way of repeating itself as the observation goes. Sooner, or, later, as the tide continues to turn, the people will respond to the pervasive sickness that permeates this regime and the land, and do something about it. The populace will once again become sick and tired of the sickness. When that happens, and I do believe that day is coming, a second president in my lifetime will be leaving the White House in disgrace. The people will line the streets and salute farewell to the commander-in-thief in similar fashion to how they "welcomed" him on "inauguration" day, June 20, 2001. The difference this time will be, however, that George W. Bush will be leaving the White without legitimately having been elected in the first place. Perhaps then, we can, begin to recover.

Answer 7

Impeachment is based on rule of law and does not mean Removal of the president. The President would have to actually commit a crime and as much as you think he may have he has not. Believe me If GWB had the Dems would have had the HOUNDS after him already. Should you be sent to jail for 10 years for asking this question? Many don't like your question, No crime you are free...........

Answer 8

If the evidence is there to prove Bush lied about the reasons to go to war then yes he should be impeached. Bush has lied so many times to the American people it would be nice to see some justice.

Answer 9

Is there a question????? Bush has no respect for anyone and no regard for human life!
He needs to be Impeached, be accountable for all his crimes. He and all the gang and the cronies! NOW! Before he (they) blow Iran! For the same reason they blew up Iraqi, with a pack a lies!

Answer 10

Comparing the impeachment of Clinton with the potential charges against Bush it is so inexplicable that he is not facing a court of his "peers" .