why dont we just have a national IQ test and the person with the highest IQ is elected president, of course, thay would have to be able to do the job, but he cant be worse than our last 2 presidents.
2007-01-17 18:42:42 · 8 answers · asked by jn_dogs 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
clinton was estimated at 160
and buzzh at 96
2007-01-17 18:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
IQ fine. But there also needs to be a common sense test. Everyone with a high IQ does not have common sense.
2007-01-18 02:51:18 · answer #2 · answered by Mani 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IQ tests have nothing to do with experience, diplomacy, and Pandering(which most like out of the three). Some of the most uneducated have succeeded in life by sure will and determination as well as likability. EDIT: ignore the attention seekers.
2007-01-18 09:03:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
why not make them take a common sense test. we all know what lack of common sense our present leader has.
2007-01-21 20:38:11 · answer #4 · answered by ruwako2002 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't be a good solution.
2007-01-18 03:03:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
yo yo yo
yo gangstaz r juz so dum
yo foo' come get u some give me yo chedda innocent pedestrian ya all r ********
**** YALL!!!!
2007-01-18 07:58:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
because deomcracy doesn't work like that! and hitler was a genius... how well did that turn out?
2007-01-18 02:52:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
have no idea
2007-01-21 11:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by jerry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋