English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who 100% thinks that 9-11 is what the government says it way?

Who thinks the government knew that it was going to happen and didnt do anything to stop it?

Who thinks it was all a set up?

Check out 911truth.org - scary stuff!

2007-01-17 18:35:32 · 23 answers · asked by beth3988 3 in Politics & Government Government

23 answers

Setup.

1) Read "Operation Northwoods", the US government's formerly classified plans to develop a "terror campaign" to CREATE an "apparent threat to peace in the Western hemisphere" in 1962. Page 10 describes how to FAKE an attack using a commercial plane so to TRICK the public into supporting military action on Cuba/Castro. (Just for fun, pretend it says Iraq and Hussein wherever it says Cuba and Castro, and see if anything sounds familiar.)

2) Note that Saddam Hussein was NOT tried for anything related to 9/11. Consider how much MORE money and effort was put into finding and executing HIM than in tracking down Osama bin Laden, who was allegedly responsible.

3) The man in the infamous needle-in-a-haystack "confession" tape is clearly NOT Osama bin Laden - compare with the FBI's own photos and description and see. The 9/11 attacks are not even mentioned in the FBI's Wanted poster for him. George W. Bush stated that he was "not concerned" about bin Laden because HE KNOWS that Osama had nothing to do with it, and that the U.S. already had plans for starting a worldwide war as of 9/9/01, two days BEFORE the faked attacks.

4) WHY, when Bush's scheduled appearance at an elementary school on 9/11/01 had been well-publicized, didn't the Secret Service evacuate hundreds of innocent children to safety, and whisk him away to an unknown, secure location IMMEDIATELY, if the U.S. was TRULY under attack by foreign terrorists. THREE allegedly suspicious incidents involving Middle Easterners threatening Bush were reported in the Florida town where he was staying on 9/10/01, yet instead of being rushed to safety, he continued his visit with the children (rendering him unavailable to make defensive decisions that only the President can make), and then gave a press conference at EXACTLY the time and place he was previously SCHEDULED to be. When his plane finally left Florida over a half-hour later, there was still NO military security escort. Isn't the President supposed to be protected at all costs in the event of a REAL attack on the nation? Shouldn't the schoolchildren have at least been made less of a target?

5) How did a piece of PAPER from inside the clothing of a man who was allegedly on a plane that EXPLODED in a fireball that was supposedly hot enough to vaporize the entire plane AND destroy a steel skyscraper, just happen to float out safely UNSINGED? Isn't it a little too convenient that similar items were miraculously found at the other crash sites, where the planes also mysteriously vaporized, unlike other plane crashes?

6) Larry Silverstein leased the WTC buildings just 6 weeks before 9/11, and protected them with 10 insurance policies that would pay out $7 billion in the event of TWO separate incidents. Several prior attempts to demolish the money-pit buildings had been denied because they were laden with asbestos.

7) Another Silverstein property insured for hundreds of millions, WTC7, was only the 3rd steel building in history to collapse due to a fire that didn't burn hot enough to actually melt steel (WTC 1 & 2 were the others). He admitted to approving the controlled demolition of the building, which occured just hours after the attacks. WHEN did explosives experts have time to SET charges throughout the building that day, and wasn't that a bit risky if there were lethal fires burning inside it? Why doesn't the offcial report on 9/11 mention the destruction of WTC7?

2007-01-17 20:50:31 · answer #1 · answered by gelfling 7 · 1 2

Nobody, even the commissioners themselves believe that the 9/11 commission was truthful. You can research that yourself. Also to reassure yourself that a 757 hit the Pentagon, try and find a video of that happening. -if you believe that none exists, then I guess you'd believe anything. So if one does exist, why are we not shown it? but simply five frames showing a small fireball, and that fireball very much smaller than we know happens when a full sized plane slams into a wall. I can see you've decided that you will do the best you can to believe the official conspiracy theory, that's how I started off, I wanted to completely discredit any idea that the Towers were demolished, etc. But unfortunately, for my peace of mind, I am not quite stupid enough.

2016-05-24 02:35:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I Think That It Was The Way The Govt Could Start A War And Make Money They Raise Taxes And The Only Send Half Of It Way So They Get A Profit

2007-01-17 18:42:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

“The hypothesis is not absurd ... that those towers could have been dynamited, A building never collapses like that, unless it’s with an implosion.”

“The hypothesis that is gaining strength ... is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizens of all over the world. “Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq.”

U.S. launched those wars to ensure its political and economic power.

The U.S. government says al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden masterminded the attacks which is a total lie and every one sees right though it and if you dont you are serious detach from reality and need to open your eyes...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-01-17 20:03:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think the aliens forced bush (who is also an alien) to do it.Saddam Hussein is actually alive,it was part of the plan,and he is now shacking up with the Bush Twins.bin Laden is not a terrorist either,Bush just made that up because he is Bill Clinton brother in law.

2007-01-17 19:36:13 · answer #5 · answered by Aaron L 3 · 1 1

I think the government was lazy and could have done more to prevent 9/11 from ever happening, but I am not convinced that they were involved in any way.

2007-01-17 18:39:08 · answer #6 · answered by suzanne 5 · 4 2

You are right it is scary, but it is hard to say. While I think that the Michael Moore film was funny and amusing, I think that he got a little carried away, and that some of his theories are conjecture.

2007-01-17 18:47:12 · answer #7 · answered by o 3 · 1 1

yes it was a conspiracy and USA government and Israel did it ya they did it and no one else to give them self the right to start their war war , Israel want to erase their enemy and USA want the oil ,and money and that's what happened
even i think that bin laden work for USA who knows,

2007-01-17 18:44:03 · answer #8 · answered by take me away 1 · 2 0

I think it was a government set-up but I'm still trying to figure out why. Maybe Bush did it so he could invade the MIddle East and use his company to drill for oil behind the facade of a war?

2007-01-17 18:38:38 · answer #9 · answered by JayCe 2 · 5 3

You will never be able to think something is 100%. No matter how true it seems. People have doubts about reality to an extent.

"I'd rather put my 1% in 99 people, than put my 100% in 1 person."

Besides, this is old news.

2007-01-17 18:39:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers