No...it would be a disaster.
2007-01-17 17:50:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by mizzjerry 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
At this point, neither would seem to have had any sort of real job, like you and me may have had, They are both pretty faces, although Hilarity C has more than a few track marks on her back. Really, what credabilty does any woman have who can over look her husband having his D.. k s..ked in theOval Office.
She is an a** Kisser from beyond the great tomorrow. As a woman and a wife, I will never forgive her for turning her head at that. If she had divorced him I might think she is a real woman , fit for the job. No way will I ever vote for some one like her. And if Obama lines up with her, he should hit the wall, big time.I hope he has better advisors than would let him line up with someone like her. Fresh , Yeah, Ha, Ha, Ha, the joke's on you.
2007-01-18 02:28:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by character 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
They are what we will probably end up with because people love safety over freedom. They are both socialists who will rob as much liberty from Americans as they can as they assume power and pack there pockets full of cash. We need a return to the constitution and self reliance. The Rebulicans are no better really.
see: constitutionparty.com
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." [Samuel Adams]
"I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution or that have failed their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed" before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents "interests, " I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very best I can." [Barry Goldwater]
2007-01-18 01:19:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Evolution is Missing a Link! 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
So that's a reason people should vote for them? A woman and a minority? Great reasoning. How about the issues and where they stand on them. I remember when Clinton was running and heard some women voting for him because they thought he was good looking!! More great reasoning. Scary to think that there really are people who will actually vote for a candidate solely based on their sex, race, appearance etc.
2007-01-18 03:05:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh hell no, Dem's will tax us to death, and they don't have a plan on Iraq, all they do is complain about bush, yet they have no clue either. Hillary will move towards the center with running, she is totally liberal, so that's a lie right their. Obama is not experienced enough as a leader, he also has no clue about Iraq either, the Dem's solution is to cut and run. And that's no solution. If they run we are really screwed.
2007-01-18 01:08:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by hexa 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
barack obama is the senator from illinois
2007-01-18 01:12:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by elyse 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I must admit, it's a pretty good 'recipe' for winning, at the very least.
2007-01-18 01:06:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by JADE 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you realize how sexist and racist your question is? People need to be judged by what they do or say, not by what gender or color they are.
2007-01-18 01:03:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Woo hoo! Tax me to death and tell me where and when I can see my doctor! Yay!
2007-01-18 01:02:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
no she is great
2007-01-21 11:46:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by jerry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋