Should the Democrats seek to impeach Bush and the gang?

Answer 1

On what grounds? Do you think if there were any they wouldn't have done it by now?! And it would also be their political suicide. They'd never get voted in in 2008 or the next midterm elections. It would take at least the next two years to get it done and an enormous amount of money, more than the demo's would want to part with. Most important of all he's not done anything wrong yet.

Answer 2

In order to get intelligent answers to this question you need to state why he would be impeached. All of these people talking about Clinton are morons. Clinton was not impeached for diddiling Monica. He was impeached for lying about it in court under oath. If you or I did that we would be put in jail. You cannot just impeach a president because you do not agree with his politics. Why dont you work so that in the future we can have a choice that is more diverse than one stupid republican and one stupid democrat. If Bush had real competition in 2004 he would not be there now. Since he is you all need to suck it up and support your president. If you dont think he is your president than move out and come back to vote agiain in 2008.

Answer 3

Bush is the kind of dangerous, out-of-control president the founders had in mind when they wrote impeachment into the Constitution. If Bush isn't impeached then we might as well crown our presidents king, dissolve Congress and go home and wait for the secret police.

Answer 4

No they should not. We have experienced a rash of recall elections and impeachment threats and even one impeachment of a president in recent years. And it was all a lot of malarkey.

Our elected representatives should get back to work and skip all that non-sense.

On what grounds can they do it? The aluminum tubes lie. Bush knowingly lied to the American people to support a preemptive military action. It is well known and well documented.

In addition, if they got a partisan special prosecutor similar to Ken Starr, I'm sure they could railroad Bush on a dozen other missteps. All they'd have to do is prosecute him without his brain (Cheney and Rove) present. Bush would hang himself.

Answer 5

I feel the same way as the guy with the clinton posting. Who gives a shyt if clinton got head... no one!!!!~~~!!

Bush has much more of a right to be impeached than clinton ever did.

But it is up to the majorityof the people, we are run by the people and for the people

Answer 6

Do your self a choose and prepare your self on political, financial, and social cycles. George W. Bush has executed not something in any respect to get impeached. It exchange into bill Clinton that signed the bill in 1999 rolling returned Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. whilst he did that, it allowed banks run amuck with specific investments which includes mortgaged returned securities, derivatives trades of all varieties, not purely interior the US yet worldwide huge. so some distance as "food affliction outbreaks" that been happening because of the fact the beginning up of time. With worldwide commerce being what it is those days, we can anticipate even better issues interior the destiny. And mutually as you probably did not point out this, we can probably anticipate outbreaks returned of polio, small pox,TB, and so on. because of the fact we've assorted immigrants that don't communicate the english language and don't get appropriate immunizations for his or her infants. gas fees....in the process the Jimmy Carter administration we had to deal with meant shortages of gas...waiting in strains for hours on alternating days to additionally be waiting to get gas. The housing fees of interest have been very intense, interior the youngsters . He even have been given on television and asked all and sundry to curtail Christmas lighting fixtures for that year. He additionally had the Iran hostage disaster. "thousands and thousands of Iraqis have been given killed because of this guy." it is unlucky besides the undeniable fact that, think of of how many muslims could have been killed had Truman been president....Ask the human beings of Japan. each president has had their proportion of considerable issues. some lots worse than others. returned this comes with the cycles that I reported earlier. so some distance as President Bush being impeached, not purely NO yet HELL NO!! I awaken each morning and thank God that he exchange into our president after 9/11. i'm advantageous that Gore ought to not are growing to be the US returned on it fairly is ft after 9/11. If experience like blaming somebody ......oh in no way ideas, i'm surprisingly specific all of this falls on deaf ears and a slender ideas.

Answer 7

No. Although it should be done!!!!, the Deomcrats actually need to start planning on how to take over and fix all of the crap that the Bush administration as left behind.

Answer 8

Yes

Answer 9

Absolutely not.... the American people should seek to impeach Bush and gang...

1. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.

2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.

3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.

4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.

5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.

6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.

7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.

9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

10. Gross negligence in failing to assist New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina, in ignoring urgent warnings of an Al Qaeda attack prior to Sept. 11, 2001

Answer 10

YES!YES!YES! BUSH AND HIS ADMINISTRATION HAVE PUT THIS COUNTRY IN MAJOR TURMOIL. HE TOOK A HORRIBLE SITUATION AND USED IT TO FURTHER HIS OWN PERSONAL CAUSE . WHY IS IT THAT NO ONE SEEMS TO REMEMBER THAT PRIOR TO 9/11 BUSH WAS CONSTANTLY RANTING ABOUT IRAQ. WELL, 911 HAPPENED AND THERE WAS HIS PLATFORM. i JUST DO NT GET IT. HE NEVER PROVED WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. THEY SAY THERE WERE, BUT HE MOVED THEM. COME ON! AMERICA ,THE SUPERPOWER WITH ALL ITS SATELLITE TECHNOLOGY AND EVERYTHING ELSE COULDN'T HAVE CAUGHT HIM MOVE THESE WEAPONS?PLEASE!!! THE MAN IS GONE AND STILL NO PROOF OF W.OM.D NOW HE WANTS TO ATTACK IRAN, KOREA AND WHOSE NEXT. THE MAN HAS NO DIPLOMACY AT ALL. TOO BAD WE CANT HAVE CLINTON BACK.