English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean it's not going to bring the other people back to life. So what's the point? I personally feel that Osama Bin Laden should be the one hanged and not Saddam Hussein if anybody. However, it's not going to justify the people back to life so....Anyway Bin Laden why not? Is it because President Bush is still his friend? A friend doesn't do 9/11 attacks, and how are you as a president going to let him get away with that sh*t? I mean you see him on TV with videotapings and walking through the mountains. Now, how do you still not know where he is? Come on do they think viewers are stupid or what? They know where he is! It's like if I took a picture of you? Someone has to know that a camera was snapped by someone(no ghost) at you in order to take the picture. Understand what I mean?

2007-01-17 15:43:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

No. If you think about it, the Bush administration has nearly killed as many people in four years of war as Saddam did over the period of his entire reign.

2007-01-17 15:51:42 · answer #1 · answered by Ed Mr. Bassman 2 · 0 0

I didn't see a whole lot of the usual Mid East outrage over the hanging of Saddam. They seemed to get more worked up about the Danish cartoon a few months earlier

2007-01-17 16:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saddam's Death only justified the the brutality of the American govt that we are pushovers to our Middle Eastern and Muslim Neighbors.In my opinion Saddam should have got life in prison his death was totally pointless it will only increase the violence and the insurgency to greater levels!This was an attempt to make Bush's Shamocracy look good and his mafia!

2007-01-17 16:03:04 · answer #3 · answered by roburo2002 5 · 0 0

regrettably, i think of that Saddam had to die in this variety. finally, sarcastically adequate he ended up loss of life on an afternoon that exchange into not of his choosing, merely as he arranged for thousands of Iraqis in the time that he exchange into in capacity. i think of that the justification for it is that for the period of the tip even though he confirmed concern (probable of loss of life) he nonetheless confirmed no be apologetic approximately and no be apologetic approximately over the way he brutally reigned his united states of america. right here exchange right into a guy that had his brother-in-regulations killed upon their return to Iraq after giving them assurances that they does not be harmed in the event that they got here returned to Iraq from Jordan (the place that they had initially fled from him). i've got self assurance that he additionally had his ex-spouse killed too. I advise it is how he dealt with his very own relatives, not to show his countrymen. it is merely incorrect. I concern for Saddam's soul. i'm getting the sensation that he might have an prolonged hellish eternity looking forward to him....

2016-12-16 07:19:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The killing ofleaders from order of the western world does not change anything.Our leaders have killed twice as many people.Osama Bin Laden is the ring leader behind everything.Where is he?

2007-01-17 17:23:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hell yea! Live by the sword.. Die by the sword!

2007-01-20 20:39:42 · answer #6 · answered by BigWashSr 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers