English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't get it. The VAST majority of the deaths in Iraq over the last two years have been the results of Iraqies killing each other in terror bombings and attacks. Why is the USA blamed for this when we are doing everything we can to stop it. That makes no sense to me.

2007-01-17 15:29:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

because we destroyed the peace their. We disbanded the Army and brought the terrorists to Iraq (because they didn't start there). They've been at war for generations, we know that, but the US has made unreal unrest worse.

2007-01-17 16:03:17 · answer #1 · answered by Beau B 2 · 0 0

I believe people think the US is responsible because we went into Iraq and toppled their government.......so,all the violence that is happening now is a direct result of this action......It doesn't matter if it is the insurgents that is killing all the Iraqis...it only matters that we are in Iraq so we are the cause for all the deaths that has happened since..I don't necessarily agree with this..but I do believe that the idiots on the hill are idiots (way more than one)...They should have known what would happen once Saddam and his Baath party was gone...all they had to do was look at the history and the different factions that make up Iraq.......

Our troops are doing the best they can ..they have been put into one **** of a position... but this is a civil war..and I believe it will have to be played out before Iraq can be at peace ....and the only ones that can put a stop to this..is the Iraqis.....and our presence there is only adding more fuel to the fire and giving the insurgents an excuse to continue with the violence........

just my opinion........

2007-01-17 16:41:47 · answer #2 · answered by LeftField360 5 · 0 0

If my old memory serves me correctly, Kuwait was originally part of Iraq before the British interfeared, Winston Churchill was probably the first to Gas the Kurds, America/Britain/France rotated their support for Iraq and the Iran depending on how things were going,and using area as a test for various weapons in war etc. Saddam Hussain, whilst being over the top, ruled with a "rod of iron" with a little bias, but country was otherwise relatively peaceful internally.
United States is running out of oil , hence the theory of "global Terrorism", . We appear to have little concept of the mind set of the arabs (tho' Lawrence of Arabia did!) hence all the deaths and mayhem in Iraq. Without the illegal war for Regeim change it would not be happening.
In the build up to this war I forecast that Iran would be next... watch this space for media hyping up of events to permit this.
Oh and why are we in Afghanistan? Is it the Taliban or POPPIES.

2007-01-17 23:24:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why does the US get blamed??? Let me ask you a few questions in return. What was the situation like in Iraq 10 years prior to march of 2003???? What is the situation in Iraq now?? What is the difference if any? Now let me put things in perspective because it seems you are one of a countless bunch, who has been tarnished by Jewish controlled media outlets. Let us agree that many Americans are completely dissatisfied by the current president (myself including). What if China (a sovereign state) suddenly invaded the United States for the sole purpose of liberating you from this "terrible tyrant that they perceive to be Bush? After many years of war the country is in tatters. The Chinese (and their state controlled media) say they are killing "insurgents (those resisting their rule) when in fact that is entirely untrue and they are killing ordinary civilians. I have seen many people get infuriated and fight someone because they talked **** or even looked at them wrong. But imagine if they (the Chinese) shot at you and were raping your moms. Oh did I mention they go house to house killing civilians every once in a while? On top of that they (intentionally and strategically) open a rift between the blacks, Hispanics, whites, now here is the situation before the war..... Hundreds of media outlets getting hyped over a woman that died of water intoxication. And this is the situation after... "There is bloodshed in the streets of Harlem today as white supremacists have taken revenge for last week's kidnappings with a series of shootings that have killed 27." And do you think this situation is not possible to any extent whatsoever? Are you willing to discount those whites who feel, blacks have no place in America, (believe me there are) and those blacks who finally have their opportunity to get back at the white man. This situation is only hypothetical in nature but serves as a good example because when the dust has settled and the blood has just dried, for a minute, you can ask yourself a similar question. Who is to blame? If you have any kind of attention span you would remember those who caused “This” and who are to blame (The Americans).

2007-01-17 17:40:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

How the USA can hide its name after committing the biggest crime of our modern times by invading a sovereign country, and destroying its infrastructure, just to capture one dictator. History will tell that Mr Bush actually destroyed two countries one is called Iraq and other is called USA. I wish we had a sensible President, and sensible Senators who all together brought USA to such a disgrace.

2007-01-17 16:41:51 · answer #5 · answered by miamian 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers