they are both alright players and Pietrus is injured. i was wondering if i should drop him for Blount.
2007-01-17 15:17:41 · 10 answers · asked by nerding around 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Since there isn't an IR spot in fantasy basketball, I say drop and replace him with whoever you can get production out of. The exception to this is if you have a first tier player like Arenas, or Garnett, whereas you have no choice to keep him. Someone like Pietrus you can drop in a heartbeat and without conscience.
2007-01-18 04:20:38 · answer #1 · answered by grifokid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get Blount definitely. Blount will give you consistent nos. than Pietrus. Blount is a starter. Pietrus may give you good nos. from time to time when he plays but GS has a lot of healthy players right now with the addition of Sarunas, Jackson and Al Harr, playing time may be an issue for him. If Pieturs won't play well, he may not get the mins. Blount has guaranteed mins.
2007-01-18 13:57:45 · answer #2 · answered by Spurs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd drop him, but reluctantly, if you've been happy with Pietrus. There's no substitute for a high FG% player who can really knock down the three (especially in H2H, where he keeps your opponents honest), and the latest word is that Mickael's hoping to be back in the lineup come Saturday. But, the real concern, if you ask me, is how Al Harrington and Stephen Jackson will affect the team. Experts seem to think it'll affect Barnes or Ellis more, but I wouldn't be so sure. I could see Nellie putting Jackson at the 2 spot, leaving Barnes at small forward, and bring Monta and Mickael off the bench. True, with the Warriors, it seems that whoever's healthy is a fantasy stud so long as at least one major player's injured, and somebody's always been injured. But, the Indiana guys are coming in healthy and there's only so many minutes to go around. And that's why I'd say Mark, even if Mickael keeps hittin' high percentage threes.
-Regards
2007-01-18 06:28:34 · answer #3 · answered by dishnivels 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you need rebounds stick with Blount, Pietrus may score a little but doesnt do much else.
2007-01-17 15:34:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely. Behind Kevin Garnett, Blount has thrived, and played very well this season, much better than he did in Boston. You should definitely do that move, before someone else picks up Blount.
2007-01-18 12:18:58 · answer #5 · answered by yahskaraghu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree...go for Blount if you need rebounds...he's been on a nice little run lately. It all depends on your needs and what your center spot looks like currently.
2007-01-17 15:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by prekinpdx 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blount but if al jefferson is available get him or mutombo while yao ming is out. Daivid lee and jeff foster also get boards
2007-01-17 16:48:45 · answer #7 · answered by dizzy22 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no keep blount. hes on fire right now, scoring and rebounding.
2007-01-17 17:09:01 · answer #8 · answered by jcenathuganomics 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might say lebron... its not inevitably a undesirable element... i propose each and every participant on his group is soooo inconsistent apart from him..... he has to dish dimes, sparkling the glass, drop buckets, scouse borrow, and block each and each interest....
2016-10-07 08:04:33 · answer #9 · answered by armiso 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
drop him
2007-01-17 18:29:30 · answer #10 · answered by Bassey 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋