...wouldn't Clinton be just as liable for the attacks as Bush? Think about it. The 9/11 attacks took 3-5 years to plan and carry out. Who was president 3-5 years before 9/11?
No, I don't believe this BS, but I wonder what the extreme left conspiracy theorists think about it.
2007-01-17 13:41:11 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
people want to lay blame. You know whos fault it was? The hijackers. End of story. They bear 100% blame. Not Bush Not Clinton. Not Reagan. Not the Dems. Not the Repubs.
where mistakes made, that in hindsight may have prevented 911, yes. In hindsight. For every clue clinton or bush should have picked up on, there were a million that meant nothing. We do have the opportunity now though to ensure that it never happens again. Iraq is all about the terrorism. As long as we are killing them there, they are not killing us here in the US. Bush doesn't give a crap about Iraq. The terrorists are flocking to Iraq to take care of the great satan and in the process, we are killing them and they are killing each other in record numbers. Everyone that dies is one less to kill a innocent american some day.
I do think Clinton should have been a little more agressive after the first WTC attack. Maybe it would have prevented 911, but thats all water under the bridge. We have to deal with the here and now. And here and now we have to kill as manny of them as we can before the spineless dems pull the troops out.
2007-01-17 13:51:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
the authorities admits that there became a propsal called "Operation Northwoods". and it became in basic terms that a idea. President Kennedy refused the concept and that is the top of it. there have been many proposals positioned forth for the period of that factor body, some labeled, some no longer, some good, many poorly concieved. like various organisation the goverment will seem at a surprising type of thoughts to handle themes because the upward push up, in basic terms because some one proposed it, do not imagine it would want to be seen heavily. I advise that you learn up and the Cuban disaster of the early 60's, the Bay of Pigs, and so on. you're shocked at what you'll locate. by technique of your posting this interior the way that you probably did leaves a mess of questions of your purpose. Are you attempting to say that is what got here about on the WTC? a lot of human beings attempt to apply this as evidence for the WTC activities, so your are going to get some nuts replying the following.
2016-10-15 09:30:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now is known that the attack took several years on the planning, but the Bush administration knew one year to one yer and a half that something was on wheels, perhaps they have checked many of the people who were traveling between USA and Spain performing the last arrangements. The problem is that they didn't do anything. Before the 9/11 attack just one person was arrested and just by immigration paperwork. The question in here is "If they knew so soon "Why they didn't do anything about it?"
2007-01-17 13:55:34 · answer #3 · answered by Javy 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't think we should be pointing fingers to be quite honest. 9/11 happened. What a terrible day that was. Those who were personally involved will never forget that day. Etched in the minds of all Americans for the rest of their life. I say, stay in the present and the future of America. If we are all sitting here pointing fingers of things that happened in the past, how are we ever going to get a resolution for the present and future?
2007-01-17 13:55:48 · answer #4 · answered by hbuckmeister 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Even if Bill Clinton tattooed "I AM 100% RESPONSIBLE FOR 9/11" on his *** and paraded naked in front of those guys, they would still blame Bush.
I still want to know what, exactly, was in those highly classified documents Sandy "the Burglar" Berger stole from the National Archives. And I am absolutely stunned at the complete lack of interest in the story - we all know who's *** he was covering. Gee, good thing for Sandy he's not a conservative....
Wow. After reading some of these responses, all I can say is CRACK KILLS!
2007-01-17 13:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by Jadis 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes
2007-01-17 13:44:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Neo Cons were putting together their 9/11 plans at least 5 years before it happened (during the Clinton administration) and they would have done (the terrror attacks) sooner only they needed a Republican President who believed in them to pull it off.
2007-01-17 13:46:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
All of the oil in the Arab countries have been under the control of Cheney Bush and Halliburton for years. Didn't you know that. We went to war to get even more oil ,just ask any Lib. Why all oil tankers fly the Texas flag everyone knows that! Just think we went to war to get more oil to burn just to prove Algore wrong. Everyone knows that Cheney Bush and Halliburton are the cause of global warming! But don't worry Queen Nancy well save us all in 100 hrs.
2007-01-17 13:52:19 · answer #8 · answered by ngo 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Can't wait to see what kind of garbage they will spew up. Most likely we will just see the usual insults and ranting and no PROOF!
2007-01-17 13:44:08 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
people just cant pass up the conspiracy theory. i agree with the poster's ?. there was no conspiracy. the people want a scape goat and bush was it. so you people please keep your conspiracy theories to yourselves. its gettting old and ridiculous. the ones who believe in the conspiracy theory are probably in on it anyway.
2007-01-17 13:53:15 · answer #10 · answered by watch_out 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋