Ted Kennedy, a car, a river, and a 5th of liquor. Sure, how to him over to Iraq, but they can blame that on Bush also.
2007-01-17 12:41:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Whoa...a Chappaquiddick reference. Really? If that reference wasn't something like 38 years old, that would be quite a zinger.
2007-01-17 13:40:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
There must be a question in among all that horse dung somewhere, but I can't find it, much less a rational thought.
So you don't like Teddy boy, big whoop, neither do I. And the democrats haven't exactly come up with a plan to control terrorism yet, who would have thought it.
If you want to discuss how terrorism should be fought, discuss it and spare us the jingoistic party bashing nonsense, it accomplishes nothing.
2007-01-17 21:10:42 · answer #2 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No weapon could change a thing in Iraq. It will take time, monney, men, and whole lot more of time and monney...
2007-01-17 22:45:15 · answer #3 · answered by Jeronimo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you think you could run this country.not in your wildest dreams.people don't understand that war today is completely different than ww11 and vietnam.the weapons are completely different and so is the whole concept of war.pete
2007-01-17 21:15:15 · answer #4 · answered by THE SHADOW 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh! Do they have one? Or will they sit and whine about it and let our country go to hell.
2007-01-17 21:41:47 · answer #5 · answered by smeezleme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that had been a Republican the Media would have lynched him.
2007-01-17 20:59:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ah, I see you guys are getting your second wind after your pathetic loss.
2007-01-17 20:49:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Better than gay orgy with your pastors.
2007-01-17 20:59:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
your damn right.
2007-01-17 20:48:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋