2007-01-17 12:19:22 · 12 answers · asked by nino 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The notion that our nation might need to go to war faces every president, whether they are combat veterans or not. FDR wasn't in the military, yet he sent us into Germany during WWII (a good thing). Your logic is way off here--to say that a president who didn't serve in nam can't send us to war is flawed.
However, I agree with you that the war in Iraq is wrong, but it's not wrong because Bush isn't a combat veteran. It's wrong for many more reasons.
2007-01-17 12:25:25 · answer #1 · answered by surfinthedesert 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Another hypocritical liberal. Tell me, did Clinton have any military service record? Of course not. Yet when he sent troops to Bosnia, not one of you liberal sycophants asked if he had the moral authority to send troops into combat.
Grow up coward. At least be brave enough to ask the same question of both sides before you make yourself look like a fool.
2007-01-17 12:38:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why do you people act like he sits around watching a video of Iraq, hoping Americas youth are dying there? Think he might actually be protecting America and it's people? Or is everything a goddamn conspiracy? If you are Americas future, were fuked!
2007-01-17 12:24:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Clinton didn't go to Vietnam sent Rangers to their death in Africa.
Sent our troops to Kosovo both with out UN apporval.
Save it about military service.
If it was so important to you guys you should have help reelect Bush Sr. and Dole.
Considering liberals like Durbin loves to compare our troops to Nazis, Kerry calling them dumb & terrorist.
Face liberals don't care about the military.
2007-01-17 12:29:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You idiot!! So he didn't serve in vietnam not everyone did!! He is sending troops to reinforce the ones there. We do need more.
2007-01-17 13:14:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Did you serve in Vietnam?
If so may be we should make you the Precedent
so we can send the boys over ..eh?
if not * in your face yelling like a drill sarge*
WHAT YOU TALKING S**T BOUT BOY ah !
2007-01-17 12:23:47 · answer #6 · answered by Mijoecha 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because thats all we have, maybe we can start sending over attack dogs so people will shut up about it. Just me asking, but have you ever been to Iraq? Didnt think so.
2007-01-17 12:24:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Because he is a politician, not a soldier and knows not how to fight a war.
2007-01-17 13:13:28 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because he likes waging war,like a good Christian
2007-01-17 12:27:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Becasue he is a jerk. He gratuated from HARVARD!!! I think he payed all his profesors to give him an A in their clas. ANyway, he is sooooo stupid!
2007-01-17 12:23:22 · answer #10 · answered by ~I love my baby brother~ 1 · 2⤊ 6⤋