...and then somewhere down the line, they can each just cancel each other out.
I don't embrace any political party. But I just cannot stand these two women. (Iand at least I'm being honest about it.)
2007-01-17 12:10:27 · 18 answers · asked by rare2findd 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For those who thought I didn't ask a question,look again.
2007-01-17 12:27:58 · update #1
Hilary tells you whatever you want to hear and Condi Rice is just a liar and a yes-woman without a soul.
I don't want either one in the White House.
2007-01-17 12:14:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, I'm not an american (thank goodness) so I wouldn't be voting anyway. However, it seems to me that neither of them would be any different from everything that has gone before. The trouble is that the US spends most of its education budget on convincing the people that they've been "well educated" when in fact, tho opposite is true. It still seems to be the case that a college degree in the US is somewhat easier than an English GCSE. Perhaps the Americans ought to first improve the education of the general public - dangerous because then they'd be able to think! Then look for a potential president or two from the intellectually superior members of their society. Of course, the primary problem is that they should never have overthrown our benevolent rule. Perhaps we should send in the gunboat :-)
2016-05-24 01:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rice has no experience in politics other than saying yes to Bush.
Hillary and Edwards will give Democrats 8 years in the White House. She has the money and the power. The 2008 elections will cost $500 million for Democrats. Hillary already has $40 million in the bank for 2008.
2007-01-17 12:21:06 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How about reversing it with Rice as President...then she can request and get the resignation of the VP (Nixon did it) and the House of Reps can elect Obama as VP.
There's a scenario that won't happen. By the way...the power of the President is never canceled out by that of the VP...but you know that.
And people...learn to take a joke. Or, OMG...you actually thought this was a serious question. Please tell me you people don't vote.
2007-01-17 12:19:52 · answer #4 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Screw hilary! she is a dumb blonde
Now on the other hand Condy is a real diplomat, intelligent, and a skilled negotiator. She would get my vote if it really would count and I am not even in USA or one of it's citizens. But you have a treasure there, so embrace it. Anything else that's on offer is the pits and as false as the story of burning bush!
2007-01-17 12:17:21 · answer #5 · answered by Shelty K 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure...........senator Hillary Clinton may try but there are very slim chances of her wining. Ms. Rice? now that's pushing it a bit too much. It will take years and years of changes in the American society. I am sure Ms. Rice won't be around till then.
2007-01-18 02:56:05 · answer #6 · answered by Vaas 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I Think who ever supports the troops an whats best for America, I think Bush is the best man for the job at this time to be honest.
God Bless America home of the free,and a heck of a lot of Christian brother and sisters, So who ever it becomes we should always pray for them.
:)
2007-01-17 12:18:55 · answer #7 · answered by Mijoecha 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather Rice be president, and Hillary be in the private sector
2007-01-17 12:17:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I can't stand them either....
Hillary is so obviously phony (she supports the Iraq war) and Rice so readily excepts the role of supporting lies throughout the world.
2007-01-17 12:13:31 · answer #9 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You seem to not be able to grasp political process or international affairs so why are you even here? If you dont understand politics it doesnt make you sound smart to do it anyway.
2007-01-17 12:15:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋