Goverment questions what do you think?

Question

1) What are the most important programs that our local, state, and federal levels of goverment should spend on money?

(2) If you could ask preident Bush or senator Kerry one question about the deflict and taxation, what would it entail?

(3) how strong is the social security program? who should be held accountable for the programs in this taxation retirement program?

(4)Describe the successes and failures of goverment spending in our society ( new schools, roads, corruption, waste etc.)?

(5) So you believe that the presidential candidates have listend to the concerns of our citizens? Will the next president wisley use our tax dollars for positive spending programs?

Answer 1

I'll answer them in reverse order.
5) The more liberal the more wasteful the dollars will be spent - unwise.

4) Anytime anyone looks for a quick fix, the waste skyrockets. The seller of the quick fix usually has deep pockets to FILL.

3) Social Security was never intended to be ones sole source of retirement income. In fact the age of retirement was set in the beginning 3 years after the actuarial tables predicted death. This means it was to show how nice some group is without it costing them anything. The funds can't be kept in a locked box or the economy WILL TANK. Social Security depends on a thriving economy to have a positive cash flow. Just look at what the Fed does with interest rates to effect the economy then imagine all those SS funds locked in a box either being eatten by inflation or evaporating because the economy is spiralling down. Finally Social Security can only invest in government debt. Once the cash flow is negitive the deficet goes up.

2) The president has very little to do with the deficet, therefore I wouldn't waste a valuable question on it. The 1st world's economy depends more on the availability of energy. We use it both to make us more productive & since our products are aimed a the upper segment of Maslow's hierarchy of needs the consumer needs energy to use our products. My question would be what are yoou going to do to change the economics of Renewable Energy. I wouldn't blind side him with this question. This question deservse carefull thought. If one builts the capacity to replace the dwindling fossile fuel for an over night switch over the owners of that capasity will go bankrupt just like ENRON did. If they wait too long to start the transition the present needs vs future supplies will fight for dollars. This will happen at the time Social Security is drying up all social programs. Since both government & private dollars are getting scares the economy will spiral down.

1) Spend dollars on infrastructure not on consumables. Stop teaching entitlements.

Conclution if the economics of Renewable Energy isn't fixed to supply a return on investment expect the economy of 1850 by 2050. Those that can afford to pay for their energy need up front for 30 years aren't looking for a return OF their investment, but return ON their investment. The 2 biggest cost of Renewable Energy are the infrastructure to capture "Free" energy & the land it sits on. When manufacturing the infrastructure the cost is in the energy to build it. Yes it is do able once you acknowledge the creators of Renewable Energy are going to either demand the cost of energy skyrockets after installation or sellable spin-off benefits are designed into the infrastructure.

Answer 2

Why does the authorities substitute the time each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days? many of the homes are artificially lit and maximum shops and agencies do not open till 9:00 AM and 0.5 of the time the line lights are on in the day time. Are we quite saving power, or is the authorities only showing the flexibility it has over "we the human beings" and messing with our bodies?

Answer 3

of course not, have they ever? and what would make one think they will start now? they will have all of these problems solved before election, then forgot about the minute the election is over, then get behind closed doors and laugh at the stupid sheepel, saying I sure fooled them didn't I ,