Angel, definetly
2007-01-17 11:59:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wings 'n Light107 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think Holly, just something about the name Angel I don't like. But Amber is better than both of them.
2007-01-17 11:54:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by thejoo44 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope she's a Christmas baby, either way.
Both are great...Sorry to give you a non-answer as my answer! I have a personal attachment to Holly, but think Angel is prettier.
If it were totally up to me, I'd convert Angel to Angelica...it just adds a little bit of extra femininity.
2007-01-17 11:54:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by abfabmom1 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Holly sounds really cute. Angel is heard too much so it kinda lost it's cuteness.
2007-01-17 12:40:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Deanna 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I like Holly
2007-01-17 11:50:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't like babies being named Angel. I just look at them and I think of a baby that died and lives in heaven. I know, not terribly logical, but that is always what pops in my mind and it makes me really sad. So I say...go with Holly.
2007-01-17 12:25:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by sundropsuzie 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Holly is a good name that sounds cute.
2007-01-17 11:52:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Raven 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Angel...Holly is ok, but Angel is very pretty and feminine.
2007-01-17 12:07:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Melissa L 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd say that Holly is cuter, though they both sound a little ditzy/slutty.
2007-01-17 11:53:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Shy_Shy 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
i prefer holly
2007-01-17 11:49:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋