This is a question about the test-tube baby, dubbed "Baby Noah", recently born from an embryo found in a New Orleans IVF freezer after Katrina. Are you all mad that the embryo wasn't used as reseach material for stem cell research? That embryo might have been the cure for Michael J. Foxx's Parkinson's or Christopher Reeves death.
2007-01-17 11:35:03 · 8 answers · asked by Tony Z 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Baby Noah was planned and wanted by his parents.
2007-01-17 12:02:22 · answer #1 · answered by correrafan 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
So, an embryo was just found, put in a random woman, and then born? Just for fun? I don't get the question because I don't know the entire story. If he was born just because they were testing embryos or something like that, that would be upsetting. I am not, however, upset that the embryo was not used for stem cell research.
2007-01-17 11:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The embryo was never alotted for stem cell research. The embryo was the Markham's and scheduled to be ued exactly the way it was. It is great they recovered it, along with about 1500 others, belonging to local families.
Thanks for you concern.
2007-01-17 12:00:21 · answer #3 · answered by woodthi32 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oil isn't a renewable source and that is understanding. Our authorities became warned of this over two decades in the past. we've various different elements except oil that we want to start up exploring somewhat of stripping the Earth. by technique of in basic terms drilling and by no ability doing something (wind, water, image voltaic power) we are no longer helping the surroundings and are making issues worse. the in common words ones reaping benefits from drilling are enormous oil agencies (Bush has inventory in Oil as do many different politicians) What a wonder our authorities hasn't performed something to provide up this earlier. Who will lose funds--politicians and enormous oil agencies. Too many are brainwashed to imagine that drilling is the in common words way and could no longer position self belief in the different case till that is finally shown or maybe then Republican extremists gained't admit they were ever incorrect.
2016-10-15 09:24:18 · answer #4 · answered by hudrick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a provocative question, but if you use it to blast liberals you will not have a useful dialogue (if that is what you want.)
If you want to get into a discussion with someone, labeling them at the outset just does not work.
2007-01-17 11:40:44 · answer #5 · answered by Susan S 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
You must really believe that ALL 'liberals' are one person. lol. Your partisan politics are REALLY contributing to your idiocy. Just letting you know...even though I suspect you've heard it before.
2007-01-17 11:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, I am happy that it was not destroyed either.
2007-01-17 11:40:46 · answer #7 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WERE MAD THAT THE YEAR YOU WERE BORN THERE WERE NO LAWS AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS GIVING BIRTH TO BUTT BABIES LIKE YOU
2007-01-17 11:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋