Why aren't men not allowed to not pay child support for a child that they don't want, while a woman can choose to kill a child she doesn't want?
Does equality only count if a woman is being oppressed, and not a man?
If a woman can freely have sex without consequence (not counting rape and incest victims), why can't a man?
Also, why when I ask certain questions, do SOME people answer them bitterly like I did something to them personally?
2007-01-17 11:06:48 · 9 answers · asked by The Cult of Personality 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ah...there you are "Right you are Ken".
As expected...you're being a bitter blogger.
I was asking a legitimate question, and you call me a ranter?
Ever hear of "The pot calling the kettle black"?
2007-01-17 11:22:37 · update #1
Ah, the beauty and hypocrisy of liberalism and radical feminism, where the man is the lesser sex, where the man has no choice to whether his child lives or dies, but if it lives, then he must pay for it. What about the man that wants the abortion? Boom, if the girl says no, he's got an 18 year long bill. What about the man that wants that child? Boom, the girl says no, and aborts it down the tube. HE CAN DO NOTHING. Radical feminism isn't for making the sexes equal, instead it fights for female superiority. I wont stand for it! Equality, not superiority!
2007-01-17 11:19:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because it's the WOMAN who gets to lug around a growing human being in her uterus and experience the pain only birth mothers know.Why is it that the women are the ones who have to raise the children and the so-called men only have to give up some money.
2007-01-18 15:30:11 · answer #2 · answered by daddiesslut88 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I often see answers indicating that if a women kept her legs crossed, there would be no consequences and no abortion debate.
Ditto for the guy who doesn't want to pay for a child he doesn't want - perhaps he should have kept his zipper up.
That a women has the right to kill a child she doesn't want is another debate altogether - a very controversial one, at that.
2007-01-17 19:24:09 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a socialist, I agree with you. It is hypocritical to force a man to pay child support unless he was its legal guardian at some point (i.e. after a divorce, but not just from randomly having sex). Women have a range of contraception choices, including abortion. If they choose not to use them, it should not be the man's responsibility.
2007-01-17 19:25:21 · answer #4 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Another very good question. One for which I'm sure libbos have no legitimate answer. Ranting ? I think not. Just good sensible observations. Keep it up.
2007-01-17 19:26:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree
The US should have a marriage agreement
-Cheaters are fine $5,000 + pay for the house and pay for the cost of the stupid wedding
2007-01-17 19:25:45 · answer #6 · answered by Taco 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
liberals dont understand what fairness means.
and thats a memo.
2007-01-17 20:16:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You got no clue, why don't you stop while you're ahead? Don't insist on making yourself look like a person who is doing nothing but ranting.
2007-01-17 19:19:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Well when you start carrying children and giving birth...then I guess you can make that call....until then...
2007-01-17 19:19:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋