Im curious if you all agree with the latest US law in patriot act II that says doctors can order terminally ill elderly and mentally handicapped children to be euthanized to put them out of their misery? Is this a good law or bad and how to protect people who dont want to die?
2007-01-17 10:38:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yes it is good for our country and our economy. The infants that are put down are severely retarded or autistic and will never amount to anything just look at Terri Shiavo she had to be put down to save the state money.
2007-01-17 10:43:08 · answer #1 · answered by surfinthedesert 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
bad idea.what does this insanity have to do with anything?Could it be the labor market is dwindling and it wants control of the young work force? this question makes no sense at all and it disgusts me.period. Should i suspect this act as the reason lots of people are dieing. has someone gone overboard with their so called right to kill at will? is every one going to fit that category eventually? or do they already? i think someone needs to be put behind bars for a long time for passing such an ***@stupid rule.how about euthanizing some of those idiots who think up this stupid(S***!)
2007-01-17 10:58:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a sturdy question! even as you probably did not for my section conform to settle for and abide by the guidelines, your ancestors did, and also you're certain by their movements. The founders of the U. S., it truly is the human beings that ratified the U. S. structure, certain themselves and destiny generations to abide and settle for the guidelines of the U. S.. in words of a social "settlement", it runs from our ancestors. it truly is genuine for all societies, no longer only the U. S., going back because the earliest days of mankind. Many early cultures had "coming of age" rites, the position by a tender man or woman might want to settle for being an man or woman in that society, and be universal by the soceity. cutting-part u . s . a . states have dipensed with this, yet you may it in many faiths. it truly is binding on you, via the instantly ahead regulation, without the choose for convey consent. it truly is a effortless understanding that underlies the U. S. structure, and the type of all u . s . a . states. a similar isn't genuine interior of a similar way on your criminal responsibility to obey state guidelines. Many states predate the U. S. structure, so your criminal responsibility to them stems from the social settlement between you and your sovereign promptly. For exmaple, your criminal responsibility to obey state guidelines arises interior of a similar way because the duty of a citizen in a kingdom to obey thier king. there might want to properly be no structure. because both duties, between you and the state and also you and the federal authorities are basically distinct yet alke in many many methods, there is important friction between both. some have idea that the State settlement is better to the federal settlement, and that the Federal settlement became revokable, for this reason the civil conflict. the rigidity between both keeps to this present day.
2016-11-25 00:02:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no such law in the U.S.
2007-01-17 10:42:56 · answer #4 · answered by David M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That law (if it has indeed passed) is only for those who WANT it and not for those who don't. Please research more. You will get your answer there.
2007-01-17 10:42:30 · answer #5 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Link to that or shutup.
2007-01-17 10:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
HAHAHAHAHA "patriot act II"!!!!!
2007-01-17 10:48:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am in favor of it, only if it doesnt include ME. (Oh, Nooooooo, help help HELLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPP!!!!)
2007-01-17 10:47:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋