English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and not aopjtpas[jgvp9rnf so do you have IQ and logic, and why do human have logic and IQ,

why do we kill all sick and old, save money and just focus on the strong, according to evolution, only strong should surive and why are you not joining the war, and kill your neighbour , rape his wives and keep his belongings, and why

2007-01-17 10:37:30 · 6 answers · asked by albertt 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

6 answers

Is this question supposed to make me religious?

2007-01-17 10:41:51 · answer #1 · answered by Nicole B 5 · 0 1

Your question is not very clear. But if you're asing what I think your asking then my answer is, the scientists do not have a big bang, that is a theory they have on what ended the evolution of the dinosours and started the KT period because of fossolized evidence from the KT boundry line. The line appears to be burnt, and you find not dinosouars above it. Which means that marked the end of the dinosaurs. Its all really complicated really.

____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
___*____*___*___*____*****______*_____*
_____*____*______*______*_____*_____*_

The lines represnt different lines. The further down the lines are the older. The line of K's represents the KT Line, aka the period when the dinosaurs ceased to exist. The * represents dinosaur fossils. See how there are none above the KT boundry line? That shows that after that line there was not significant dinosaur life. The line itself shows burt type materials which is why the scientists think the plants was effected by a "metior" which if big enough, would have caused the entire planet to be engulfed in fire. Again this is a complex thing to explain in were typed words.

Im now goin to resight a quote from Kurt Vonnegut's Book Slaughter-House Five. This seems to be a panacea for all questions...

Billy Pilgrim asks "Why?"
Here says the Tramafladorian: "Why? That is such an earthling question. Why you? Why us for that matter? Why anything? Because this moment simply is. Have you ever seen bugs trapped in amber?"
"Yes", Billy said, he infact had a paper weight in his office that had three lady bugs in it.
"Well here we are Mr. Pilgrim, trapped in the amber of this moment. There is no why.

What ever people say about god is retarded because there CAN be a god and an evolution. But the big bang is NOT the theory of evolution. It's the theory of what happened to the dinosaurs. Evolution has been proven to exist. And no mater what people believe or what religion they are, it exists. Scientists have the evolution because this is what they have found EVIDENCE of. Evidence as is pure evidence, not just a book and some avid believers.

According to the theory of evolution we evolved. We didn't kill to survive. You are a very confused person my dear. You are talking about "Survival of the fitest" Which is another concept entirely from evolution. Evolution doesn't say who ever is stronger will live. It says who ever can adapt the best will live on and evolve. The rest will die out. You don't seem to know anything about this issue, I assume you never had to learn this in shcool. Go research it some before you start critiszing it, eh? Then come back and ask a sensable question about evolution and I'll answer that one for you to. :) Im not trying to be mean or rde, I am simply answering your question.

2007-01-17 10:52:06 · answer #2 · answered by Mirror 2 · 0 0

Crikey !!!!

1. The Big Bang is a hypothesis - residual background radiation would lead us to believe this is true

2. There is a universe because it was created by the Big Bang

3. Logic is something that is also shared with some of the "higher" animals

4. IQ is merely a convenient construct for measuring "intelligence" - all animals will have an IQ

5. Evolution is not about killing the sick and old

6. We do not kill our sick and old and save money because most of us have a social conscience

7. I don't join a war because I am a pacifist

8. I go for a drink at the pub with my neighbour - why would I want to kill him?

9. As for raping his wife (he only has one - loser !) no thanks, I'd rather have a w*nk

10. Why do you bother putting dumb questions like this on here and why the f*ck did I bother to answer it ?

2007-01-17 10:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by the_lipsiot 7 · 1 0

For the first part of your question answered with a question; why have you asked an unanswerable question?
I most certainly can read "aopjtas[jgvp9rnf".
As for the second part I believe it has something to do with the fact that humans have no natural enemies; no thing is above us on the food chain. It's a shame really, we'd all be a much better species if there were something out there hunting us.

2007-01-17 10:56:23 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

You're rambling. Science does not attempt to answer why. It only looks at what is, and attempts to make sense of it.
The rest of your question refers to survival of the fittest, but sometimes that means the ability to work together.
You ask why do we kill the sick and old, I haven't heard of that happening.
As for strength, there is an example. A caveman who is terribly nearsighted makes a lousy hunter, but makes beautiful arrowheads. The strongest hunters go out to kill for food and not all of them come back, but the nearsided guy who stayed home is busy making babies. His quiet insecure self is passing his genes along and the bravest hunter gets a funeral. Evolution is not in a straight line.

2007-01-17 11:15:48 · answer #5 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 1 0

there is no such thing as the Big Bang. God created everything you see around you, and things you cannot see.

2007-01-17 10:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by ClaireBear 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers