I don't think so. She doesn't even know what she is doing. First, she was for the Iraq War, then she changed her mind blaming George W.Bush, and now she is against the troop surge in Iraq. I have no impression on her. Period. !!!
2007-01-17 10:20:25 · 7 answers · asked by spider 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't like her at all and would never vote for her - but I do feel that she has enough qualifications to run. Hopefully the Democrats will nominate someone who is more agreeable than Hillary. I would like to see John Edwards receive the nomination.
2007-01-17 10:32:40 · answer #1 · answered by Rob F 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Personally I do not believe she has the qualifications simply because she is a junior senator and is still "learning the ropes" so to speak. Yes she was the wife of a former president, but that plus less than one term in the congress does not add up to alot of experience in the political arena. (Note: the last several winning presidents were state govenors, not from the senate/house)
However, what exactly makes a person qualified to be president other than the stipulations set forth in the constitution? It could be Joe/Sue down the block who has never left thier own nieghborhood that gets enough votes, and therefore (unless taken to the supreme court?) is president.
2007-01-17 10:30:13 · answer #2 · answered by Flynn380 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm afraid she is qualified. I think ALL the politicians were for the war at first, because of the WMD, but now since they found none...they've ALL changed their minds. My impression of her is she's sneaky, she has an agenda, and just may end up being our first woman president. Is that scary??
2007-01-17 10:27:01 · answer #3 · answered by ksgirl 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She may be qualified, I'm not sure. But the real reason democrats like her, and want her to run, is because she is one of the very few rational liberals out there. She actually uses her brain on occasion (imagine that)!
2007-01-17 10:38:43 · answer #4 · answered by The Reaganite 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
she is more qualified than Bush was when he first ran for any office, including the Presidency. Yet, party liners voted for her. I'm sure the opposite will work for her with party liners voting for her. She can't possibly be worse than Bush, although I do not feel she will be the last Democrat standing.
2007-01-17 10:25:27 · answer #5 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary has less time in politics than Barack Obama, being first lady doesn't count as being in politics.
2007-01-17 10:25:46 · answer #6 · answered by SJohnson 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She'd probably steal the white house blind again.
2007-01-17 10:24:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋