English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

According to the book Jawbreaker by Gary Berntsen, the CIA operative in charge during the operation at Tora Bora, Rumsfeld declined to give the ok to take down Bin Laden. He did not appropriate the resources necessary to do it. Why? And Why do Repubs complain that Clinton never tried to get Bin Laden? He did more than Bush did, he actually attacked the terrorists camps while Bush ignored the memo that said OBL was determined to attack in the US

2007-01-17 10:17:10 · 19 answers · asked by Dark Helmet 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Ddey-so, Bin Laden is determined to atack in the US, and we tell people in Japan and Korea on alert? OBL and a bunch of Saudi's attack us on 9/11, and we invade Iraq? I'm noticing a pattern here. Are we sure Bush really did give up drinking?

2007-01-17 10:33:17 · update #1

19 answers

If the Bush administration took out OBL, they wouldn't be able to play their boogieman card to boost their approval rating.

2007-01-17 10:22:59 · answer #1 · answered by Mario Savio 6 · 4 5

Bush Junior did not have a clue approximately economics and after 8 years he nonetheless would not have a clue Why could you think of he has a clue whilst additionally be attentive to he is going returned and forth with the vast 3 Bail OUT? i don't think of Bush jr. is acquainted with assorted stuff approximately something yet bull chit and taking holiday trips Bush Junior had greater holiday trips then the previous record Holder Ronald Reagan..the two slept their way by way of 8 years as being POTUS

2016-10-31 09:36:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

OH boy just another common day Bush basher.

Does no one seem to remember the awesome bunker busters? I do. Or do you think that was a lie and they made that up too? Sheesh!

http://www.dispatch.com/national-story.php?story=dispatch/2007/01/12/20070112-A16-01.html

http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0304/p01s03-wosc.html

If terms of the mission were to try and go find and show the world that we had captured and killed Osama bin Laden -- even though we didn't do that -- that's a very difficult task. Some folks underestimated how difficult the task is to find somebody in his own backyard. ...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/campaign/ground/torabora.html

2007-01-17 10:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

He did. Can't find him.

Berntsen has been discredited. That was an old Kerry propoganda book that was discredited before it even was published. Clinton bombed an asprin factory not any terrorist camps. Bush took out most if not all of the camps in Afganastan, not Clinton. The FACT is Clinton was handed Bin Laden on a silver platter from the Suadis and declined.

2007-01-17 10:24:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

the bin ladens and the bushes have been business partners since world war 2. see carlyle group.

2007-01-18 09:29:04 · answer #5 · answered by jj raider 4 · 0 0

while I'm not too sure about the source you cite...

at the very least, by government released troop numbers alone, it seems we have had a relatively weak attempt to get him, for someone that killed so many on U.S. soil...

why? I have no idea, but it's my biggest problem with Bush... I have no doubt that if the U.S. military wanted to get him, we would have him...

and really, if you ask me, the past is in the past, and we're dealing with a post-9-11 world... and saying "Clinton didn't do it" isn't an excuse for your personal incompetence... stop making excuses... it's your job now...

maybe we're waiting for him to attack us again to have an excuse to go into Iran? it worked for Iraq apparently?

2007-01-17 10:25:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Bush put a little effort into looking for Bin Laden, but with no success, he decided to stop the search rather than keep looking and fail on yet another mission. @#$% both of them!!

2007-01-17 10:24:24 · answer #7 · answered by mole on crutches 2 · 1 2

he did,,but he hidden in the mountain somewhere,,he could be dead by now as he was on a kidney machine,,and the tapes they get can be made with dates ahead of when they were taken to show he is still alive,,no one talks about him anymore,,i think he passed away somehere and it is kept quite

2007-01-21 03:31:32 · answer #8 · answered by jerry 7 · 0 0

clinton did NOTHING to get bin ladin. he didnt even have to get him, he had him OFFERED to him.

bush has killed all the alqueda leadership and ladin is trapped in a cave.

you are an idiot

by the way ddey killed your ***. damn id hide if i was you. u got made a fool of

2007-01-17 12:42:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh because Bin Laden needs to be free so his image can be resurrected at election times to scare people with.

2007-01-17 10:19:27 · answer #10 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers