Can Bush use American forces to attack Iran without consent from congress?

Answer 1

http://www.fas.org/man/crs/IB81050.html

Apparently not though circumstances could be found where this could happen, especially in the face of blatant aggression on the part of Iran or if they presented themselves on an existing battle field.

Answer 2

Oh yes!

He is the "Commander In Chief," he controls our military, and takes us to war.

All congress can do is try to "tighten the purse strings" so he won't have money to do it. But Bush is savvy enough to know that our Congress doesn't want to take away funding that may put our soldiers lives in jeopardy. What I mean is, they can cut spending on supplies and such, but it would cost us American lives on the battlefield.

So if Bush wants to go to war with Iran, we will.

Answer 3

He can on his own authority but congress can refuse to allocate funding for such a venture. It's true that Iraq was Bush's idea but he did have the support of a ill advised congress.

Answer 4

I hope so!
Can't always wait around to take a vote on what course of action to take if it is emanate, So it will happen soon with out warning,if their smart, and they are!
And maybe the reflex zone of a few other enemies won't hurt either. That way we do not have to be intimated by ungodly countries like that ol Dragon any more and get on with our lives.
I freeking love America!
Canadians are AWESOME!

Answer 5

Bush can order the troops into anywhere.....he is the commander and cheif....what keeps him from having total control is that congress has to approve all the funding for equipment and supplies.....so he can send the troops but congress does not have to approve the funding, meaning they won't be there very long.....

Answer 6

Senator Joe Biden doesn't think he can. I guess we'll have to wait and see after the next Gulf of Tonkin incident takes place. President Bush isn't sending patriot missiles and a carrier group over there for no reason.

Answer 7

those are 2 distinct questions, yet enable me attempt to respond to them at the same time. As President, Bush is likewise Commander-in-chief. He has the criminal authority to respond to attacks without the consent of Congress. it truly is designed this way through personality of conflict. judgements should be made without delay in time of conflict, and there is no longer time to search for suggestion from 535 contributors of Congress. below the conflict Powers Act, besides the undeniable fact that, he's meant to seek Congressional approval previously attacking yet another u . s . a .. "parts of the conflict Powers decision require the President to confer with Congress earlier to the starting up of any hostilities to boot as oftentimes till U.S. military are literally not engaged in hostilities (Sec. 3); and to get rid of U.S. military from hostilities if Congress has no longer declared conflict or exceeded a decision authorizing using rigidity interior of 60 days (Sec.. 5(b)). Following an reliable request by the President to Congress, the time minimize might want to be prolonged by one extra 30 days (likely even as "unavoidable military necessity" calls for added action for a secure withdrawal)." So, in idea, Bush might want to attack Iran in the journey that they attacked us. might want to he provoke Iran into attacking? perchance. might want to Congress have the ability to provide up him from attacking Iran? back, no longer in the journey that they attack us first. (and what constitutes an attack? in the journey that they ensue to take a number of our sailors who ensue to be patrolling close to/of their waters, might want to that count number?)

Answer 8

Yes he can under the current interpretation of executive powers - by the presidentially appointed Attorney General. Giddyup!

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Answer 9

Surely. The president would not get impeached either as I think Nixon did so.

Answer 10

i don't think so, but i don't see a ground invasion of Iran in the future. it already got too messy in Iraq. we may see the use of a nuke.