I ask because when I was in high school we learned that the Americas were sparsely populated when the Europeans arrived, and most of the inhabitants were nomadic tribes of one sort of another. Also, they were naieve politically
Turns out that research since at least the 60s is leading people to believe that the Americas had more people than Europe at the time, and that cities like Tenochtitlan were more populous than Paris (and in better condition, with running water etc.). The disparity seems to come from the fact that by the time later Europeans came to document the native peoples, up to 8 or 9 in 10 native peoples had died due to smallpox, influenza, or other disease brought (unintentionally in the vast majority of cases) by Europeans. That accounts for millions of people and also for the quick fall of some of the civilizations after conflict with Europe.
Also there was complex, Machiavellian politics in the new world before Eurpeans came.
Do they teach any of this these days?
2007-01-17
08:39:46
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Musmanno
2
in
Social Science
➔ Anthropology
btw: I was in school long after the 60s research came out, so the details were there we just didn't learn about them.
2007-01-17
08:40:45 ·
update #1
To Cy: Interesting. The research has been around a while at this point. There is a recent book called 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus, that documents much of this. It is an extremely interesting read.
http://www.amazon.com/1491-Revelations-Americas-Before-Columbus/dp/140004006X
(and no, I'm not the author of it nor do I know the author).
2007-01-17
08:56:42 ·
update #2