Who would pay the cost of recovery?
2007-01-17 08:19:40 · 7 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I certainly hope not. That would be an act of war, and we all know war is bad. It is much better to not have war and just stand idly by while all non-Arab Sudanese are murdered by their government and the Janjaweed. The US does not have the right to invade a country for such a little reason as that. And wouldn't it be better to try and sit down with them to understand their anger?
Have I hit all the major Neo-Dem talking points on war?
2007-01-17 08:35:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if in the meantime, Clooney marries Oprah! The pay of their recovery will be paid by Hollywood!
2007-01-17 16:24:31 · answer #2 · answered by markos m 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably...sad but that's the only way Darfur will be on the news.
2007-01-17 16:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by kissmybum 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oprah I'd pay to rescue. She does do some good now and then.
Clooney I'd leave to Charlton Heston to decide what to do.
2007-01-17 16:28:20 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope they save clooney the guy makes so good movies.
2007-01-17 16:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Troops to rescue them? I think not.
2007-01-17 16:22:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They have enough money to pay their own ransom.
2007-01-17 16:30:12 · answer #7 · answered by us5we2 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋