I suggest you research exactly how many have been there...you might just be surprised!
2007-01-17 07:39:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by kissmybum 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Other senators have visited Iraq too. How can this be manipulative BS? You're making the rest of conservatives look bad. How is a potential presidential candidate suppose to comment on Iraq when they've never been there?
2007-01-17 07:40:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mike Honcho 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, it's very normal for senators and representatives to go to both Iraq and Afghanistan to support the troops. Why would you suggest that it's manipulative BS? She voted for the war in Iraq and she has supported it ever since. You probably didn't know that did you? You thought all democrats mindlessly goosestepped behind Michael Moore. Sorry to disappoint.
2007-01-17 07:42:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by billy d 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
right it truly is the information ma'am. All those democrats voted for it to approve going to conflict it choose be. on the prompt all of them knew saddam's military became shot. Iranian conflict, Gulf conflict ONe and it would want to be an common victory. thinking the way it became getting in Afghanistan they must have figured they extra useful vote for it or lose their voters. unhappy ingredient is basically the genuine elderly fellow spoke up hostile to it. If the democrats as an entire had stood up and denounced it likely does no longer be there now. regrettably products that would want to reason any of them to lose votes or the lobbyists money are literally not prevalent. I blame the great peace loving democrats better than Bush because it became what they must have executed really of annoying which way the wind blew. They, the homestead and Senate have donated billions to them each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days from the lobbyists and sigs and so that they employ their households at 2 hundred grand a job, so their is a tremendous type of outdoors impact and they don't opt for to do some thing to 'rock the vote".
2016-11-24 23:41:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by niblett 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Senators make frequent trips to the areas in question. Sometimes they call it a fact finding mission or they use it as a PR stunt showing that they support the troops. Both sides of the aisle do it.
2007-01-17 07:39:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by ROBERT L O 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why is it manipulative? World Wrestling Entertainment and Britney Spears also went over, who were they trying to manipulate? BTW it wasn't just Hillary Clinton.
2007-01-17 07:40:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There have been numerous republicans that have also gone to Iraq. It's called doing there job and finding out what the troops need.
2007-01-17 07:40:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by sydb1967 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Face time. This really is a covert CIA mission, they tricked her into going by telling her it would help her chance's of becoming the president. She fell for it of course, she's a blond Liberal the dumbest of all species. The CIA knows that if the men in Iraq see this ugly ********* they will probably surrender. This will secure Bush's legacy as the greatest leader ever. Hillary will also be thought of as a hero in a since, that she helped. See everybody wins. Yea!
2007-01-17 07:48:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
If you are a Republican don't worry,I heard Hillary talking today about supporting the troop surge..so you can relax now..All the young men will probably be shipped off to the slaughterhouse in the middle east to fight a war that is not our war,and has nothing to do with the U.S.
2007-01-17 07:40:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dfirefox 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Edit to remove a copy and paste error
I don't know, but it is normal for a politician to use the troops and glamorize themselves
2007-01-17 22:44:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know, but the Governor of my state, Minnesota has visited Iraq...
Nice pic by the way. *wink*
2007-01-17 07:38:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋