As someone that generally follows Republican party lines when voting, I find it impossible to believe that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are the best possibilities for the democrats. Certainly we'll see after the primary elections take place, but in a purely superficial opinion, I think Hillary is too polarizing and that there are just as many democrats that don't like her as those that do. I do feel that if Hillary is nominated she will succeed in getting people out to vote against her, not necessarily for the republican candiddate, but just not for her. What experience does Obama have to support a run for the Presidency at this point? I know he is very well spoken and educated, but politically I'd still consider him a novice. If he holds off for 15-20 years I think he'd have a legitimate shot. Maybe someone could enlighten me on why either should be nominated. I just think that either would just make it easier for the republicans, regardless of who their candidate is.
2007-01-17
07:05:05
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
To Swim Mom- about Obama and Clinton is relative to their success as candidates. Think that both Obama and Clinton have polarizing characteristics, however superficial, that if nominated be the nail in the coffin for the 2008 election as far as the Dems are concerned. With Obama, his inexperience and his names unfortunate (in this instance) similarity to Osama, and Hillary having just as many detractors as she does proponents.
2007-01-17
08:23:44 ·
update #1