Usually re: intelligence the word "credible" is used also...is it suspiciously absent from this latest Iran situation.
Now...it's "we believe"....as opposed to "credible intelligence".
Thoughts?
2007-01-17 06:29:17 · 5 answers · asked by kissmybum 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a new White House strategy. If it's not credible, then it must be believable.
2007-01-17 06:33:05 · answer #1 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I love reading between the lines. Nowhere in supposed Iranian intelligence reports does it point to a definite threat, it's always maybe, could be, might be, etc...
2007-01-17 14:32:34 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What do you know about Iranian intelligence. If something was leaked to the public, it's probably not that big of a secret.
2007-01-17 14:47:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I guess they hope that if they believe, the rest of the nation will too. Too bad we're educated in reading comprehension.
2007-01-17 14:54:33 · answer #4 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
When they notice no one cares, they will change the language to "imminent threat".
2007-01-17 14:34:17 · answer #5 · answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋