English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Jo especially, she's only young isn't she? Saw her without make up and she looks dog rough, the skin, teeth, hair are dreadful. Is she supposed to be a model or something? Cleo looks good. Is Jo in poor health?

2007-01-17 06:22:25 · 17 answers · asked by georgeygirl 5 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

Youth is great, Danielle has youth, she won't stand the test of time, beauty comes from within. Cleo has the X factor.

2007-01-17 08:22:39 · update #1

17 answers

jo isn't a model, she's a singer. you don't have to be gorgeous to be a singer, although you should be able to sing and she didn't do that very well in the task.
i don't think she looks rough, she just looks like a normal person. she's never had the label of a glamour girl anyway. where did you get that from?

2007-01-17 06:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by AJ 5 · 1 0

She looks so different without her makeup on i couldn't believe how ugly she was,that nose is so long though like a witch.How did she get a glamour model job,i thought you had to be attractive.She looks like stef from hollyoaks,so im wondering if stef looks like her with no makeup on.

2016-05-24 00:38:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That ex-Miss Great Britain is well fit. However she's also got a dark Aura. Whats the movie with the guy from school of rock and Gwyneth Patlthrow where he begins to see inner beauty on the outside? Miss GB has the attractive looks on the outside.. but I have a mental image of how she would look if it was her inner aura transferred.

2007-01-17 06:28:33 · answer #3 · answered by Joe Bloggs 4 · 3 0

I thought the same. Think the wod your looking for is minging. And I still dont know why Danielle can justif being called a celebrity.

2007-01-17 06:31:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Jo is not a model but yes, she is rough as a sheet of sandpaper brought up in poverty on the wrong side of town.

2007-01-17 06:27:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

I think these 'glamour girls' have shown themselves for what they are. Has any one seen the film Shallow Hal. I rest my case. Hope the footballer gives the scouse girl the boot, she is so awful .

2007-01-17 07:20:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not EVERYONE looks rough without make-up some women do have natural beauty, but they tend not to be models.. odd that..?

2007-01-17 06:34:03 · answer #7 · answered by draytondon 4 · 0 0

Everyone looks plain without makeup. Did you see those photos of celebrities w/o makeup? Some of them look downright scary.

2007-01-17 06:30:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Joe looks about 55 yr old when she takes of her make up she has terrible wrinkles

2007-01-17 06:29:07 · answer #9 · answered by Gossip81 4 · 1 0

Nobody is glamorous without make-up, hair-do, etc. Those things are what MAKE glamor. Natural beauty is something else entirely.

2007-01-17 06:27:23 · answer #10 · answered by MOM KNOWS EVERYTHING 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers