What's the difference between Greek and Roman forms of Democracy?

Question

I was talking with a friend and he said that Europe carries a purer form of Roman Democracy since European governments are more Republican whereas American practices Greek Democracy since we're more about the vote than representation.

Answer 1

In Greece each citizen could attend and vote at a city meeting. When Socrates was tried, he was put before such a group and condemned .

In the Roman Republic, the populace was general divided between 2 assemblies based on class. The Senate was mainly the patrician class and the Tribunal assembly was generally plebian. Voting was based on Tribe, each having a vote. There were 2 urban tribes for the majority of city dwellers and a dozen or so rural tribes. This was far from one man one vote.

I would say the biggest difference between Europe and the US is the proportional representation of small splinter groups. In the US a candidate usually needs to gather a coalition of interests to acheive a plurality of the votes.

Answer 2

it is an fairly open ended question... you particularly need to pinpoint the term interior the historic previous of each and every civilization to be waiting to make a precise assessment. right here is an fairly simplified version that would assist you to narrow your question: Rome better from a monarchy under the Etruscian kings to a representative republic, to the Roman Empire. Greece better from small cities which each and each and each had their very very own version of a central authority, (many have been democracies, in spite of the undeniable fact that there are various diffused modifications b/w the countless cities) to an empire under Alexander. Greece then devolved into a number of smaller empires after Alexander's dying. those kingdoms might later fall to the legions of Rome. EDIT: See the two solutions right now under mine for terribly informative insights...