Both guys Are great Future Hall of famers but neither has won a championship yet, If you had to choose, who would you rather see win a ring?
2007-01-17 05:54:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
Kevin Garnett.
Lets compare the two on the court and off the court shall we?
ALLEN IVERSON:
PROS
-Puts up 30 points a night
-Adequate defense, he's good at steals
CONS
-He literally makes like 5 turnovers a game
-He has a horrible field goal percentage
-He doesn't pass the ball
-He's always complaining about something to the management such as: He doesn't like practice, doesn't think it's important. Or he's complaining about the teams poor performace or how he doesn't get enough time or some other ridiculous claim that makes no sense whatsoever
-He has no patience
-High maintenance; bad locker room presence
KEVIN GARNETT
PROS
-Puts up 25 points a night
-Grabs 12 RPG
-Humble
-Explosive and quick for his size
CONS
-Nothing significant
Kevin Garnett, unlike Allen Iverson is a textbook basketball player. He doesn't whine every time someone does something wrong and he's patient. I would rather see someone like Kevin Garnett win a championship that Allen Iverson.
2007-01-17 09:12:15 · answer #1 · answered by LaissezFaire 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Come on, can't compare those two.
Kevin Garnett is a superb rebounder, great shooter and shot blocker while Iverson is simply one of the greatest point guard ever.
If you had to choose between those two, you'd go with Garnett for sure since he's much taller and would have the advantage over Iverson... Either way, it's a mismatch, you should compare two players that can be compared. For example: Iverson or Nash and Garnett or Nowitzki... That would make more sense.
2007-01-17 06:40:55 · answer #2 · answered by m_dl05 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I wanna see allen Iverson get a ring just so he can prove the critics wrong. people dub Iverson as a ballhog and someone who cant lead his team to victory, but that is totally not the case. Allen Iverson is a warrior for fighting injuries and for staying too long with a loser of a team in Philly.
2007-01-17 07:25:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take Iverson. I think Garnett is very over-rated, and I was a big fan of his when he came into the league. He puts up great numbers, but has never made his team any better.
2007-01-17 06:22:51 · answer #4 · answered by dentroll 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I rather see Allen Iverson win a ring because he is the most athleteic point guard in the NBA and one of the most explosive
2007-01-17 06:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by Rance 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
KG has been the most consistent player for a long time with 20 plus points and 12 rebounds. Iverson has better numbers but does his team win? so i'm going to go with KG.
2007-01-17 06:02:04 · answer #6 · answered by lbj23d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
KG.
My main reason is that he is definintley more of leader, will always be a big man, so he can dominate for the next two or three years. He does have some type of range outside of the post, and is a beast on defense.
AI just isn't a leader, and when he gets older, he'll lose his speed, which is definintley the best part of his game.
2007-01-17 09:12:54 · answer #7 · answered by f0r7m1n0r 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no question in it. Ball handling skills are good, but nobody
would rather see ball handling than monster dunks. KG all the way.
2007-01-17 07:24:32 · answer #8 · answered by Justin K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, but if i was forced to choose one, Iverson.
2007-01-17 05:58:52 · answer #9 · answered by Brad NotPitt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
kevin garnett
2007-01-17 12:11:14 · answer #10 · answered by cH1n0 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋